IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tram] STUN-bis adoption call

Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com> Mon, 27 October 2014 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <brandon.williams@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF511A8A0F for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gc3W6naq6dEF for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [72.246.2.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C5C1A8759 for <tram@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760DD47547 for <tram@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:19:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com [172.17.120.126]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646AC4753A for <tram@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:19:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [172.28.115.172] (bowill.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.28.115.172]) by prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D222035 for <tram@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:19:40 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <544E547C.20903@akamai.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:19:40 -0400
From: Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
References: <CANO7kWAEaw-xf3kZiG_Q7KwN0UpsJup=D44No8zOxtC-daD6kw@mail.gmail.com> <544A6085.70707@akamai.com> <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A2834F0ED@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A2834F0ED@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/EtuHlhNsqxzJGV1bpOX71xNKwS0
Subject: Re: [tram] STUN-bis adoption call
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:20:01 -0000

On 10/24/2014 11:10 PM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) wrote:
>> Regarding fragmentation (item 5) ... I don't see any substantive changes. I
>> >don't see anything about this in appendix B.2, so I don't think I'm missing
>> >anything.
> There were discussions about fragmentation support in the list sometime back but without any conclusions.
> Please provide more details.
>

My primary point is that improved guidance on fragmentation and message 
sizes is one of the things on the list of open items and it doesn't 
appear that any changes have been made yet. I mostly wanted to confirm 
that there isn't something about this already in the document that I'm 
not seeing.

--Brandon

-- 
Brandon Williams; Senior Principal Software Engineer
Emerging Products Engineering; Akamai Technologies Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email