Re: [tram] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-10.txt

["Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <[e-mail]>]

-----Original Message-----
From: tram [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Brandon Williams
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 3:23 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [tram] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-10.txt

Hi Tiru,

Thanks for the update. I think it looks like what we've discussed.

Thanks.

Are there any other outstanding issues you're tracking that still need to be addressed? I'm not aware of any; just wanted to check how close we are to closure on this one.

All comments received from the WG have been addressed. I am only tracking couple of minor changes to the draft to align with stunbis (use MESSAGE-INTEGRITY-SHA256, change from "401 Unauthorized" to "401 Unauthenticated").

-Tiru

--Brandon

On 05/12/2017 05:34 AM, Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy wrote:
> Updated draft discusses Happy Eyeballs for TURN in Section 2.10 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-10#section-2.10).
>
> -Tiru
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tram [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of 
> [e-mail]
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 2:53 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: [tram] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-10.txt
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the TURN Revised and Modernized of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN): Relay Extensions to Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)
>         Authors         : Tirumaleswar Reddy
>                           Alan Johnston
>                           Philip Matthews
>                           Jonathan Rosenberg
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-10.txt
> 	Pages           : 81
> 	Date            : 2017-05-11
>
> Abstract:
>    If a host is located behind a NAT, then in certain situations it can
>    be impossible for that host to communicate directly with other hosts
>    (peers).  In these situations, it is necessary for the host to use
>    the services of an intermediate node that acts as a communication
>    relay.  This specification defines a protocol, called TURN (Traversal
>    Using Relays around NAT), that allows the host to control the
>    operation of the relay and to exchange packets with its peers using
>    the relay.  TURN differs from some other relay control protocols in
>    that it allows a client to communicate with multiple peers using a
>    single relay address.
>
>    The TURN protocol was designed to be used as part of the ICE
>    (Interactive Connectivity Establishment) approach to NAT traversal,
>    though it also can be used without ICE.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tram-turnbis/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-10
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-10
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-10
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
>
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
>

_______________________________________________
tram mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram