Re: [tram] Web proxy description and discovery

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Fri, 12 September 2014 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABC51A6FC4 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aOKvrZJJ2Euw for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40F8B1A6FC5 for <tram@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79736d0000053b8-42-54131f87022e
Received: from ESESSHC009.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 1B.09.21432.78F13145; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:29:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.126.142] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 18:29:58 +0200
Message-ID: <54131F86.2060204@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:29:58 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brandon Williams <brandon.williams@akamai.com>, "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
References: <5412C329.7010907@ericsson.com> <5412F1EC.5070100@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <5412F1EC.5070100@akamai.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW67vHCIwYHD0hbLHu9ktfiw9gKb A5PH5CMLmD2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJVxfvUvxoJtXBWvGicyNjD+Zu9i5OSQEDCR OLn1DxuELSZx4d56MFtI4CijxLxFSV2MXED2WkaJA2cOsoIkeAW0JbZdbQdrZhFQlbjQ1MMI YrMJWEhsuXWfBcQWFYiSeLXiBlS9oMTJmU+A4hwcIgKhEpvf2YCEhQXMJX7Nv8oCsctT4sCP bcwgNqeAlkTXxcvsIOUSAuISPY1BIGFmAQOJI4vmsELY8hLb385hhmjVllj+rIVlAqPgLCTL ZiFpmYWkZQEj8ypG0eLU4qTcdCMjvdSizOTi4vw8vbzUkk2MwFA9uOW3wQ7Gl88dDzEKcDAq 8fAmWAmGCLEmlhVX5h5ilOZgURLnXXhuXrCQQHpiSWp2ampBalF8UWlOavEhRiYOTqkGRtP4 ItvL9x0t7IWXHNXbaX1u2/z8f0+5w06x9pca35n6VyDhUK/J+qByQc/z1to3e7qD7C+u//tt vdBX1bW22ny+r75mxwZE3i4Sf9xY/Sc7vfLU7cunndkS7O+lztRcd0835OvZ7ueSTn8Ov1oS oqfxpVmxZ7pRRu3lW7XTD0xkupCWFPXrgRJLcUaioRZzUXEiAPYuacA2AgAA
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/h8oyFKZMModE5Un_7YJH2mT2TtM
Subject: Re: [tram] Web proxy description and discovery
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:30:08 -0000

Hi Brandon,

yes, that is also my understanding.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 12/09/2014 4:15 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> Also, regarding the existing proxy.pac format, I asked Mark about the
> likelihood of proxy.pac being standardized by httpbis, and he indicated
> that he has not seen clear enough support for this from the wg to expect
> that it will happen. He did not think that the tram wg should be
> concerned about this.
> 
> --Brandon
> 
> On 09/12/2014 05:55 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> from the minutes of the TRAM session during the last IETF:
>>
>>>            * TURN Server Auto Discovery
>>>            draft-patil-tram-turn-serv-disc-01
>>>            Presenter: Dan Wing
>>>
>>>            The chairs need to figure out whether or not the HTTPBIS
>>> WG will work
>>>            on standardizing proxy.pac. Also, we need to understand the
>>>            relationship with W3C in this area.
>>
>> Mark (chair of HTTPBIS) has submitted the following draft:
>>
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-web-proxy-desc/
>>
>> You can follow the discussions on the HTTPBIS list.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tram mailing list
>> tram@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
>>
>