IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Trans] [trans] #111 (rfc6962-bis): Consider using the cached-info TLS extension

"trans issue tracker" <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org> Tue, 03 November 2015 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C5C1A1A86 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 06:46:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W-mg0MDK75aq for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 06:46:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEAB21A1AB6 for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 06:46:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:35362 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>) id 1ZtcrO-000818-Ub; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 06:46:54 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: trans issue tracker <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@tools.ietf.org, rob.stradling@comodo.com
X-Trac-Project: trans
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 14:46:54 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/trans/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/111
Message-ID: <064.3cbf94aba40c29fec612e24ee721b89c@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 111
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@tools.ietf.org, rob.stradling@comodo.com, trans@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+trans@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20151103144655.AEAB21A1AB6@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 06:46:55 -0800
Resent-From: trac+trans@tools.ietf.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/1H8kr34CGtJZBq1tjV3qKB1-9CQ>
Cc: trans@ietf.org
Subject: [Trans] [trans] #111 (rfc6962-bis): Consider using the cached-info TLS extension
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 14:46:57 -0000

#111: Consider using the cached-info TLS extension

 It looks like the cached-info RFC will be published very soon:
 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-cached-info/

 "Abstract

    Transport Layer Security (TLS) handshakes often include fairly static
    information, such as the server certificate and a list of trusted
    certification authorities (CAs).  This information can be of
    considerable size, particularly if the server certificate is bundled
    with a complete certificate chain (i.e., the certificates of
    intermediate CAs up to the root CA).

    This document defines an extension that allows a TLS client to inform
    a server of cached information, allowing the server to omit already
    available information."

 SCTs and inclusion proofs are likely to be "fairly static" too, so would
 it make sense to register new CachedInformationType values for SCTs and
 inclusion proofs?

-- 
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
 Reporter:                           |      Owner:  draft-ietf-trans-
  rob.stradling@comodo.com           |  rfc6962-bis@tools.ietf.org
     Type:  enhancement              |     Status:  new
 Priority:  minor                    |  Milestone:
Component:  rfc6962-bis              |    Version:
 Severity:  -                        |   Keywords:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/111>
trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email