Re: [Trans] [trans] #110 (rfc6962-bis): Reorganize requirements into appropriate sections
"trans issue tracker" <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org> Wed, 28 October 2015 11:29 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11EA1B51D8 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AP8OVc6b0-4b for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 716CC1B51D7 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:37905 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>) id 1ZrOvC-00061x-GY; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:29:38 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: trans issue tracker <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software
To: rob.stradling@comodo.com
X-Trac-Project: trans
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:29:38 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/trans/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/110#comment:1
Message-ID: <079.79ed445d10f68bea6192139e7213bf62@tools.ietf.org>
References: <064.3d181d134b4cdc63a4a9ae45acf2b679@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 110
In-Reply-To: <064.3d181d134b4cdc63a4a9ae45acf2b679@tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rob.stradling@comodo.com, trans@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+trans@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/59FA8DrCAnEXVZFjN4vaXOXOIsA>
Cc: trans@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Trans] [trans] #110 (rfc6962-bis): Reorganize requirements into appropriate sections
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:29:40 -0000
#110: Reorganize requirements into appropriate sections Changes (by rob.stradling@comodo.com): * status: new => assigned * milestone: => review Comment: Fixed by https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency- rfcs/commit/0da7e2c942b7323c05a24944d2dcf89c62617618 and the preceding 26 commits. This is the only change between -09 and -10: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-09&url2 =draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-10 -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: rob.stradling@comodo.com | rob.stradling@comodo.com Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: review Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/110#comment:1> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/>
- [Trans] [trans] #110 (rfc6962-bis): Reorganize re… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #110 (rfc6962-bis): Reorganiz… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #110 (rfc6962-bis): Reorganiz… trans issue tracker