IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Use of Private OIDs in WG document (Re: [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax)

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 30 March 2015 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A8F1A00CD for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.356
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.356 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vXI7o90Xk4zg for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a29.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A0A1A00BD for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a29.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a29.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216166740E4 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=qImLO1G+d1obMMMUtGqD lwfV0DA=; b=y65V0tPpprQmx2pNLiFUfxFDgSKXEPTF5cRQBzxBhm91zG8iPinW T/+G5wIrS3qxSWuykCRs1pvTTjiQYufPQpQZKdbU2L3gd5AhavPBL6X4nN0XabhC yhDZa0xlgzeTKqc31PSiAMcDysxmbjiyc0mYvOHRmIPi1yOc1+gMkdY=
Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com (mail-ie0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a29.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C506A6740C6 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iecvj10 with SMTP id vj10so120912246iec.0 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.198 with SMTP id y6mr18601748igl.16.1427730009018; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.130.66 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5516D6D1.2040500@openca.org>
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73AAFB6418@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <C961CE34-4F55-4B11-86D7-1566B701911D@seantek.com> <5512C9C7.70202@comodo.com> <55159714.1070902@openca.org> <5515EB25.2090206@openca.org> <37572999-2D1A-4073-BEB0-F8566B1FE841@mnt.se> <5516D6D1.2040500@openca.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:40:08 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOhQCVSrsqihuBK-gnx-iAUqFBoKmjOma4na=5LLw+nwrQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Massimiliano Pala <director@openca.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/6pM5K9Cs2a5EezNnzdC6ITdq-oo>
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Use of Private OIDs in WG document (Re: [pkix] a question of cert (and OCSP) extension syntax)
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:40:12 -0000

There is nothing wrong with non-SDO OIDs in Internet-Drafts, certainly.

But also: there is nothing wrong with the use of non-SDO OIDs in RFCs
either.  (For the reasons that others have stated, namely, that the
assigning organization gives up control when the arc is assigned.)

Nico
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email