IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] IETF 94 TRANS minutes Draft

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Mon, 16 November 2015 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FC81ACD2E for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:09:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.064
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.064 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LLWqqOGJPv20 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22f.google.com (mail-yk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B9A21ACCED for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ykfs79 with SMTP id s79so254253593ykf.1 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:09:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=pYKCuX1dE8PcPpO6GPWNQJeZly9FkYx5IWMxWJrZCNA=; b=d8VLZEMQMa8EivGab2am09e0Pfz+KWzgIRmwaBTlr23IgJJJiTlWhIwQE7AEXMl76q g4pkD/tmnUiNo2GlPGiV2mAc/qMw7ZDwiJCNWfcA6Sm++GLGvZfwDGo/3SUojdYXTeXd NscYjSkRZLvv3a6xS5ZUsLHt5YlASK1a9xxXF93HC4DifKsSQvhsdAFCRhgbkvTvrebY itdwIy2NS/uV0Os82HrajJqsnedSb79jf5aRLGji8XK+a+9+PiZLCVRdnXyMrLl06cD1 /p32i7orAk+C1zkpxKMJkeXOPxaUrfDE4s+mCrgFs9x1X42NUie/tp7HbHIHM5kDPrJ3 QvOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=pYKCuX1dE8PcPpO6GPWNQJeZly9FkYx5IWMxWJrZCNA=; b=MY7JP67AY/qJizQjQeDy08IuKeb8yp3qNQRVH5nPZgio/CM6PXavWOl4R1S7n6ymSe 3KjmbiuV1vz8s7j2s9W+4e+1/OHub4fAImolZ2wkeS1NMaLUX7Ohel8Os9eqBRY2t9HT m9ojQPLt9pdcwIiFEY4c6lWzJzqM4TMNzB09hm9vY1dpyxIOpXSG+RRhGPwpCIAZCpnS O89PPCPXWyjco6774xFCbozYObiAigUs2ZLL6lahNFO/XzDdaLPSh5JCNpRWeTgwHzUL rcylWrg8Un12cXDvOUhv1z70mtUtFmzkUFtP+o5iG8Mhs0pCd2A9veHIEC1N+Gz3Nql1 ktoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQksPJGurQ/JmYaZSkozvoZsySgaG+AHfvVvn+tVpvwgEOQKrmNwrf/EgRlVayiUNNqrZJB2
X-Received: by 10.129.42.4 with SMTP id q4mr499216ywq.35.1447697341510; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:09:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <748e68fd32664a298722cddf8ad54ea6@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <748e68fd32664a298722cddf8ad54ea6@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:08:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CABrd9SS=Xwh8n7-u+6n7ProJBds6X8g8Go828JctxMMB_=Yptg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141fb50c8b4e70524ac4dda"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/CBMxq7ocJquFqei6ZpK7YvfYvLw>
Subject: Re: [Trans] IETF 94 TRANS minutes Draft
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:09:04 -0000

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 at 05:38 Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> Certificate Transparency (trans)
> IETF 94; 13:00-15:00 Monday 2 November 2015
> Chairs: Melinda Shore, Paul Wouters
> Minutes by Rich Salz
> GOSSIPING IN CT (Linus Nordberg)
> -----------------------------------------
> At IETF 93, WG adopted, no major changes to previous mechanisms; better
> wording including rationale.
> Policy recommendations.
> Issues: STH freshness. Protection of locally-trusted roots? Log
> misbehavior that is privacy sensitive? What is "same domain" for SCT feed
> back? Define data format for trusted auditors?  Various TBD and TODO in the
> text.
> Discussion about what inclusion proof is/contains. Dkg and bryan agree
> embedding them in cert is probably bad idea.
>

This is not helpful: I think it is probably a good idea. Why is it a bad
idea?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email