Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCT
"trans issue tracker" <trac+trans@ietf.org> Thu, 04 May 2017 13:09 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+trans@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECD312956D for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 06:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BeckRzZ3UT_v; Thu, 4 May 2017 06:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980DA129467; Thu, 4 May 2017 06:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: trans issue tracker <trac+trans@ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 1.0.10
Precedence: bulk
Cc: trans@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 1.0.10, by Edgewall Software
X-Trac-Project: Public Notary Transparency Wiki
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 13:09:29 -0000
X-URL:
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans/ticket/179#comment:4
Message-ID: <037.5caa082384b88a425064e8c547ad5cc5@ietf.org>
References: <022.c4deaa956f97aaf7d924c4d1ddc41cbf@ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 179
In-Reply-To: <022.c4deaa956f97aaf7d924c4d1ddc41cbf@ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/Jy074vaZW_iKb_6K1GbE8HxKfyE>
Subject: Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCT
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 13:09:35 -0000
#179: Indicate certificate / precertificate in Entry and SCT
-------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: rlb@… | Owner: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: rfc6962-bis | Version:
Severity: - | Resolution:
Keywords: |
-------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment (by rob.stradling@…):
Replying to [comment:3 eranm@…]:
<snip>
> Overall I agree with the sentiment that some data structures in 6962-bis
need to be renamed to clarify what role they play.
I agree. How about opening a new ticket to discuss structure renaming?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans/ticket/179#comment:4>
Public Notary Transparency Wiki <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans>
My example project
- Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #17… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #17… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #17… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #17… trans issue tracker