Re: [Trans] Starting to think about IETF 90

Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com> Tue, 03 June 2014 19:43 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <538E1059.6030907@gmail.com>
References: <538CE2F1.8020905@gmail.com> <CADqLbz+oQSSsGv0nKTDR6WZE3HOar_bYe9ZzcRzhptDjqzyydg@mail.gmail.com> <538E1059.6030907@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 23:43:24 +0400
Message-ID: <CADqLbzLq4aVt74w=SqDjUE2A8zCusYZ9t2dnxeAfQKQuU1X0rg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dmitry Belyavsky <beldmit@gmail.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5d839199549c04faf3b978"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/RP2utVPsl4N5TorFh3GAg7PTUUc
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Starting to think about IETF 90
Precedence: list

Hello Melinda,


On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 6/3/14 3:36 AM, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
> > The adoption of the CT to operate together with DNSSec seems to be a
> > separate topic and I think, there should be a separate document covering
> it.
>
> The best way to make that happen is to write one yourself -
> that will start a discussion.  Writing an internet draft should
> not be seen as a big deal - they are by their nature not mature
> documents, and it's fine to put something out there that's
> very rough around the edges.
>

Well, I'm not the person who can write such a draft because I do not
understand how we can improve security this way.


>
> We have requested Meetecho support for remote participants.
>

Thank you!


-- 
SY, Dmitry Belyavsky

[Trans] Starting to think about IETF 90 Melinda Shore
Re: [Trans] Starting to think about IETF 90 Dmitry Belyavsky
Re: [Trans] Starting to think about IETF 90 Melinda Shore
Re: [Trans] Starting to think about IETF 90 Dmitry Belyavsky