Re: [Trans] [trans] #86 (rfc6962-bis): SCTs should be returned in final format
"trans issue tracker" <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org> Mon, 06 July 2015 19:31 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA4F1B3061 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wQp8XVULX3IA for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D1BE1B3036 for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:59393 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>) id 1ZCC6f-00081w-Aa; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:31:09 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: trans issue tracker <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@tools.ietf.org, benl@google.com, melinda.shore@gmail.com
X-Trac-Project: trans
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:31:09 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/trans/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/86#comment:2
Message-ID: <070.c43aeecb659711642ffa1cde82c08314@tools.ietf.org>
References: <055.e79a51ea71a962f252e762da97b30a02@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 86
In-Reply-To: <055.e79a51ea71a962f252e762da97b30a02@tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@tools.ietf.org, benl@google.com, melinda.shore@gmail.com, trans@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+trans@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150706193110.3D1BE1B3036@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:31:10 -0700
Resent-From: trac+trans@tools.ietf.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/UE_cYp4gT4Tp6R91V2EwBWDcWGY>
Cc: trans@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Trans] [trans] #86 (rfc6962-bis): SCTs should be returned in final format
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:31:16 -0000
#86: SCTs should be returned in final format Changes (by melinda.shore@gmail.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-trans- benl@google.com | rfc6962-bis@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: review Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/86#comment:2> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/>
- [Trans] [trans] #86 (rfc6962-bis): SCTs should be… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #86 (rfc6962-bis): SCTs shoul… Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #86 (rfc6962-bis): SCTs shoul… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #86 (rfc6962-bis): SCTs shoul… trans issue tracker