Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behaviorspecified in Section 5
Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com> Tue, 14 July 2015 16:28 UTC
Return-Path: <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2F91A1BC8 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Deac1NYWer5 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mmextmx1.mcr.colo.comodoca.net (mmextmx1.mcr.colo.comodoca.net [IPv6:2a02:1788:402:c00::c0a8:9cd5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE7B41A6F20 for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8187 invoked by uid 1004); 14 Jul 2015 16:28:40 -0000
Received: from ian.brad.office.comodo.net (HELO ian.brad.office.comodo.net) (192.168.0.202) by mmextmx1.mcr.colo.comodoca.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:28:40 +0100
Received: (qmail 2310 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Jul 2015 16:28:40 -0000
Received: from and0004.comodo.net (HELO [192.168.0.58]) (192.168.0.58) (smtp-auth username rob, mechanism plain) by ian.brad.office.comodo.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:28:40 +0100
Message-ID: <55A53857.7040208@comodo.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:27:03 +0100
From: Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
References: <052.9d9fc2bb25108f9681efa566967a94e3@tools.ietf.org><067.905aedf191f612b7a69c90d6d2c8ea46@tools.ietf.org><559ACA08.1090609@bbn.com><CABrd9SQ-7e7zYB51iRdjxMQLQP5+fJwKqTbupFG5QpwHForXQg@mail.gmail.com><559FD57F.2060308@bbn.com> <559FE9C3.90409@gmail.com><55A51E30.5070508@bbn.com> <alpine.LFD.2.11.1507141040260.17991@bofh.nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1507141040260.17991@bofh.nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/Yxjw3E25kkQX77Gt5tma8SssqtA>
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>, Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behaviorspecified in Section 5
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:28:50 -0000
On 14/07/15 15:57, Paul Wouters wrote: <snip> > I hope that Ben continues to explain the views of Google on various > protocol bits. I am also confident that Ben can keep his document author > hat and $dayjob hat apart. +1 > If the working group feels that Ben can no > longer do this, we can think about adding another author/editor to this > document, provided we can find a volunteer. Is there an upper limit on the number of authors/editors that an I-D/RFC can have? 6962-bis currently has 5 authors/editors. I've heard it said that there's a rule (which is unofficial but which is enforced) that 5 is the maximum. -- Rob Stradling Senior Research & Development Scientist COMODO - Creating Trust Online
- [Trans] [trans] #77 (client-behavior): normative … trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Paul Wouters
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Robin Wilton
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative … trans issue tracker