Re: [Trans] [trans] #65 (rfc6962-bis): remove section 5.4 and reference to "Auditor" in section 3

["Salz, Rich" <[e-mail]>]

DKG emphasizing privacy?  Imagine that :)

> Irrespective of whether auditing is a function or a stand alone entity, there is
> a need for a complete description of how it works. The authors seem to have
> a different view from a proposal presented by DKG at the last meeting, in
> terms of the communication paths involved in auditing. That proposal
> emphasized privacy for TLS clients, and thus it merits further discussion. So,
> at this time, it seems premature to declare the design of auditing done. I
> suggest 6269-bis limit its discussion of auditing to noting which log interfaces
> are used to support the function, and assume that a separate doc will specify
> how auditing is performed.

I agree with this!