IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Where do things stand with the precertificate format discussion?

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Thu, 18 September 2014 06:03 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4101A700F for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MCD_QkibLzMk for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22d.google.com (mail-pd0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A693B1A7012 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id ft15so699420pdb.32 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GqQaF2ghl3C9QrQFEToyo9gNv+xTHxtpCB5u/bN4PoA=; b=iPfNdb28azW4xQXvSwX3XNgPSL6KT2Sg6yKuU9+ztI62IjrLqF2qQEQx/Nh+CHcU6a VEU21RCOzwSyZNG3DMlENMfV7MZbCEJirY4h/VSVFHzLayKfeffCPSK1fsZxKHHpS5DZ FqBSx2q6DaEhFwuhiAzOjiaEpoVSt8ohyS50NAAEu1PWnu2PJl2K+bX5bsC1yb8ZD2Zy 8hzoE12aMm6R+J/DPdWNHesK5s935UqCK9Qoj4khoeX4ByZtzRmwMPNbDAybWKtrG+0o E6+yRxQoPmpTGXwUZzSpU/BRncFwmLVKcqEOf/tI3yw8d1ZJLdOQ1qT6HBuZVGWSJULq TwtQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.129.225 with SMTP id nz1mr2765174pbb.107.1411020181279; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spandex.local (209-193-52-59-rb2.nwc.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [209.193.52.59]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yp10sm19130418pac.18.2014.09.17.23.02.59 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <541A7592.5020406@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:02:58 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>
References: <541A010E.8050402@gmail.com> <CAFewVt5P+8opZR13+EbrmTeDBfnwSu0B-5sU4gArsDuN361Jmw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFewVt5P+8opZR13+EbrmTeDBfnwSu0B-5sU4gArsDuN361Jmw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/fcotXuMEQjPfRo30FaoBlQQB_9g
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Where do things stand with the precertificate format discussion?
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:03:05 -0000

On 9/17/14 2:35 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
> I previously suggested an alternative syntax that would be much easier
> to implement:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/current/msg00500.html

Right, thanks.  My real question is whether or not we've got
something on which there's sufficient agreement to move forward.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email