Re: [Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents

Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com> Tue, 31 March 2015 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C941A8A39 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 03:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b0i3KCqohteV for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 03:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mmextmx2.mcr.colo.comodoca.net (mmextmx2.mcr.colo.comodoca.net [IPv6:2a02:1788:402:c00::c0a8:9cd6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE3AF1A8A07 for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 03:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 3406 invoked by uid 1004); 31 Mar 2015 10:04:01 -0000
Received: from ian.brad.office.comodo.net (HELO ian.brad.office.comodo.net) (192.168.0.202) by mmextmx2.mcr.colo.comodoca.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:04:01 +0100
Received: (qmail 17332 invoked by uid 1000); 31 Mar 2015 10:04:01 -0000
Received: from and0004.comodo.net (HELO [192.168.0.58]) (192.168.0.58) (smtp-auth username rob, mechanism plain) by ian.brad.office.comodo.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:04:01 +0100
Message-ID: <551A7110.8000408@comodo.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:04:00 +0100
From: Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <55163324.6030504@openca.org><20150328211906.GI17637@mournblade.imrryr.org><89D53DE5-4C92-45EB-9C9C-599D9841EB2D@ieca.com> <5519A7D9.20808@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5519A7D9.20808@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/l2kK1qY5VoPddDlO8rDsr05MtwQ>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Use of private OIDs in WG (standard-track) documents
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:04:05 -0000

On 30/03/15 20:45, Melinda Shore wrote:
> The assertion that this kind of trivia needs to be resolved before
> adopting a working group document is a complete non-starter.  That
> is just simply incorrect - a matter of personal preference, at
> best.
>
> I'd like to propose that the draft authors create a ticket
> to the effect that the IANA considerations section needs revision
> (which it does, regardless of which arc the OIDs belong to).

Ticket created.

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/81

-- 
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online