Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntax
"trans issue tracker" <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org> Mon, 06 July 2015 12:10 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63351ACE2C for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4btWbaeuGyIw for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEE4C1ACE4D for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:46696 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>) id 1ZC5ER-0003bC-VV; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 05:10:43 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: trans issue tracker <trac+trans@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@tools.ietf.org, rob.stradling@comodo.com, benl@google.com
X-Trac-Project: trans
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:10:43 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/trans/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/70#comment:2
Message-ID: <067.1d7ff2839592524f118803e277a8d6d6@tools.ietf.org>
References: <052.ecfc9a319e455c61897ed3e82e509b78@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 70
In-Reply-To: <052.ecfc9a319e455c61897ed3e82e509b78@tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@tools.ietf.org, rob.stradling@comodo.com, benl@google.com, trans@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+trans@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150706121045.CEE4C1ACE4D@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 05:10:45 -0700
Resent-From: trac+trans@tools.ietf.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/rTh-NaiicgO87V-lPs_bcTG-Wfw>
Cc: trans@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntax
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:10:46 -0000
#70: STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntax Comment (by benl@google.com): It was our view that we did not need to specify the format until the first extension was defined. However, happy to consider proposed text. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-trans- kent@bbn.com | rfc6962-bis@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/70#comment:2> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/>
- [Trans] [trans] #70 (client-behavior): STH spec n… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec n… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec n… Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec n… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec n… Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec n… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): SCT spec n… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): SCT spec n… trans issue tracker