Re: [trill] draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname

Hi Hongjun,

Thanks for making the changes. Draft looks good.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:38 AM, honjun.zhai <honjun.zhai@tom.com> wrote:

> Hi Donald,
>
>
> Thanks for your good comments, I have updated it according to your
> suggestion.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hongjun Zhai
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Jiangning District, Nanjing City, People's Republic of China
>
> Mobile: +086-025-5287-7345
>
> Email: honjun.zhai@tom.com <Honjun.zhai@gmail.com>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> 于 2015-03-09 07:35:24,Donald Eastlake<d3e3e3@gmail.com>写道:
>
> Working on the Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname
> I found two glitches: (1) RFC 5310 needs to be added to the References and
> (2) IS-IS is referred to by [IS-IS] everywhere in the document except one
> place where [ISIS] appears.
>
> I realize the Dallas meeting draft deadline is very soon but fixing those
> and update the date and version would be a very minor change. If an
> improved with these fixed can be posted before the deadline, please do so.
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
> =============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>  d3e3e3@gmail.com
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
>
>> WG:
>>
>>
>>
>> Donald pointed out to me that my original message on the
>> draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname was not specific enough.  As usual,
>> Donald is correct.
>>
>>
>>
>> This is to start a new 1 Week WG LC on the
>> draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname because there the following two IPR
>> Disclosures on draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickame:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2083/
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2444/
>>
>>
>>
>> Please send positive comments (Example: “OK with IPR”) or negative
>> comments (Example: “With IPR we should not adopt the draft”).
>>
>>
>>
>> The previous poll had all the authors respond to our IPR questions.  You
>> can review these responses at:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg06559.html
>>
>>
>>
>> The original WG LC on this draft, which made no mention of the IPR
>> disclosures, started and ended here:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg06548.html
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg06591.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Jon and I continue to be grateful for Donald’s aid in helping this
>> working group run smoothly.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sue Hares
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> trill mailing list
> trill@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
>
>

Re: [trill] draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname - 1 WG LC on IPR (3/4 to 3/11)