Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam-framework-03 as a WG document?
"Rohit Watve (rwatve)" <rwatve@cisco.com> Sat, 27 October 2012 01:00 UTC
Return-Path: <rwatve@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA8D21F867E for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36Br9GvpNKWJ for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A238021F867C for <trill@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=728; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1351299656; x=1352509256; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=IPwyGhotX/dNcdJXmkjG0xBbqU6A0fWK9L0sGzf1IK0=; b=Trlz71u8dvsKrEbU8OVdJAveGAA/2ljO9XVsHhktzOV1Fvf7qRWl1C28 qajLR1nCgrEsFZozl1kd+RFTUfD79FKSJ4ZkmmP67UZwQox7lJAnZ+zhH NX5NQTUxIiOZ4V1phcBMpcXRlxlbSfWjTuvw/T2Lhg35HM1WZ6Ymhdv0Q A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAFAMwwi1CtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABEhVG9DYEIgh4BAQEEAQEBDwEnNBcEAgEIEQQBAQsLCQkHJwsUCQgCBAESCBqHYwELnCGffwSLcYM+gk9hA6RGgWuCb4IZ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,657,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="135930917"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2012 01:00:41 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9R10dgR006274 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 27 Oct 2012 01:00:39 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.50]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:00:38 -0500
From: "Rohit Watve (rwatve)" <rwatve@cisco.com>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam-framework-03 as a WG document?
Thread-Index: AQHNs1/Tst1PRyiq1Em515ls3Oz7C5fMVfyQ
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 01:00:38 +0000
Message-ID: <56285561394EF84F8B369395C9D026560F8B6A@xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com>
References: <508A5DAE.1050801@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <508A5DAE.1050801@acm.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [171.71.58.92]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19310.001
x-tm-as-result: No--31.645200-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam-framework-03 as a WG document?
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 01:00:57 -0000
Support. -----Original Message----- From: trill-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Erik Nordmark Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 2:54 AM To: trill@ietf.org Subject: [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam-framework-03 as a WG document? Tissa presented an overview of what is in this document as part of his OAM presentation in Vancouver, and the document has been revised taking into account comments. Please indicate whether or not you think this is reasonable as a WG document in the next week or so. Thanks, Erik and Donald _______________________________________________ trill mailing list trill@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
- [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam-fra… Erik Nordmark
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam… Sam Aldrin
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam… Jon Hudson
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam… gayle noble
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam… Mingui Zhang
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam… Rohit Watve (rwatve)
- [trill] 答复: Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam… dai.xuehui
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam… Naveen Nimmu
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam… Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam… Ramkumar Parameswaran (ramkumar)
- Re: [trill] Should we adopt draft-salam-trill-oam… Varun Shah (varshah)