IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rbridge] TRILL consensus around IS-IS hello's?

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Fri, 02 July 2010 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <rbridge-bounces@postel.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-trill-archive-Osh9cae4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-trill-archive-Osh9cae4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B372328C11D for <ietfarch-trill-archive-Osh9cae4@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bpx3d4cCDGxY for <ietfarch-trill-archive-Osh9cae4@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FF33A67B5 for <trill-archive-Osh9cae4@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o62H9PX8020993; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f52.google.com (mail-bw0-f52.google.com [209.85.214.52]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o62H8gke020843 for <rbridge@postel.org>; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so510076bwz.39 for <rbridge@postel.org>; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YMxd1Jk/Zycg/gJZDZItB9cRh3zIt2W3JIn+Nwlmg8U=; b=D1EA0eZ5XGEAmfcADMjUxKXtdatHtIZUx6Uk4+MP2VA7SlSwK6fQvEFYg4xyXXeJLO rUTd3XZyzMAoXmhptaWKB1Ippp1Fdzrwqb20WLErQVJQ/wzyggnWKPU6KPNxEme3+QPM +Bf109fmmSimQa8OLRzOcJ51d9KBmFe6bHh/M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vX8++DIX3X5E+K54YGPqD/GPrrDK6mgPxylcRG2qtzsKyFFHz6Cy4QGZVLzdpGZRZD VC2HNnj9w9IiL+9e5MHuJwTAmEJmWvdzI0OlWpsD/1q+LMkwVhm4rEvAPmoG/8uSh5Xb EAuWKZvZBZDAObClTykzmhrt5F2SfITEJ8bX4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.81.77 with SMTP id w13mr889903bkk.38.1278090520798; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.78.10 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <00af01cb1a04$e75b9000$3a0c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
References: <4C125950.70306@oracle.com> <AANLkTilvoVB3CiLsZePEKFcKR0XhI6lEXhVUYibvBWBf@mail.gmail.com> <00af01cb1a04$e75b9000$3a0c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:08:23 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTil9qL82ZKTofSeMvS_2TfpX2YLnNPozOukaAouU@mail.gmail.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <ldunbar@huawei.com>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: d3e3e3@gmail.com
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by boreas.isi.edu id o62H8gke020843
Cc: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <rbridge@postel.org>, Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rbridge] TRILL consensus around IS-IS hello's?
X-BeenThere: rbridge@postel.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <rbridge.postel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge>, <mailto:rbridge-request@postel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/rbridge>
List-Post: <mailto:rbridge@postel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rbridge-request@postel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge>, <mailto:rbridge-request@postel.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: rbridge-bounces@postel.org
Errors-To: rbridge-bounces@postel.org

I don't think so. draft-eastlake-isis-trill-01.txt does *not* propose
a new PDU type for TRILL Hello.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street
 Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com



On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Linda Dunbar <ldunbar@huawei.com> wrote:
> I don't see any reason either. Is there?
>
> Linda Dunbar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rbridge-bounces@postel.org [mailto:rbridge-bounces@postel.org] On
> Behalf Of Radia Perlman
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 11:05 AM
> To: Erik Nordmark
> Cc: Developing a hybrid router/bridge.
> Subject: Re: [rbridge] TRILL consensus around IS-IS hello's?
>
> I see no reason to use a different PDU type.
>
> Radia
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Erik Nordmark <erik.nordmark@oracle.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> There was some recent discussion on the IS-IS list about the TRILL Hello
>> vs. the normal LAN IIH.
>>
>> The most recent email in that thread is
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg/current/msg02447.html
>>
>> Question for the WG is whether we want to keep the separate TRILL Hello
>> PDU, or use the LAN IIH PDU.
>>
>> FWIW draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-protocol-16 says that it is a new PDU type:
>>
>> 4.4 TRILL-Hello Protocol
>>
>>    The TRILL-Hello protocol is a little different from the layer 3 IS-IS
>>    LAN Hello protocol and uses a new type of IS-IS message known as a
>>    TRILL-Hello.
>>
>>   Erik
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rbridge mailing list
>> rbridge@postel.org
>> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rbridge mailing list
> rbridge@postel.org
> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rbridge mailing list
> rbridge@postel.org
> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge
>

_______________________________________________
rbridge mailing list
rbridge@postel.org
http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email