Re: [rbridge] draft-eastlake-trill-00

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Thu, 17 June 2010 23:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rbridge-bounces@postel.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-trill-archive-Osh9cae4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-trill-archive-Osh9cae4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBEA28C0FF for <ietfarch-trill-archive-Osh9cae4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.139
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.139 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.459, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AUaF3J5DX3Z7 for <ietfarch-trill-archive-Osh9cae4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EEA28C0F0 for <trill-archive-Osh9cae4@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5HNQnuM005814; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f180.google.com (mail-wy0-f180.google.com [74.125.82.180]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5HNPuEc005352 for <rbridge@postel.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so510705wyg.39 for <rbridge@postel.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wLgDHGTqh8it12ezV/86w5CliZOdZqMUCUB1iaTZlEg=; b=pZKu7wOaALZ4Alo0AeKFEkK44k9kQT0vgRv+Ii4PlV/csBE3r812Q3FPfTUzTu3d72 R606LedHTUp2Yhxo+DsXdiDqW87i7im5nGH4mKIRjFHroScBoCp0ooojxqcqSCIBKMDR rfVSc2FkYS/lfnOo8A/PqhDd8e4+BKSelYHGI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VTzex/Q7kfi/+IKNmXWzw887eg3MOWP9Ff7IO6gazmiP3xyC+qOmdgINZ9k64dPKIE LiilxbyDGu+jsAOODYPSeo6PtLSuFyPhUh0ZZR6QvYjeMW03Vwe+3sTcJGhB7ntSoC2M zI2jyUA4YDdvBxzyhi9sBlFQDpvDb0dJuXD2E=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.91.15 with SMTP id g15mr199091wef.15.1276817155743; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.229.210 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9793EC0A42D76D4EB2A8F94D77E21388A7E629B250@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
References: <9793EC0A42D76D4EB2A8F94D77E21388A7E629B250@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:25:55 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTilYt1-rtcGFqHg6HEFSh1R2kiMWk3E_BN2_KyS1@mail.gmail.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Pickering <jeffpick@broadcom.com>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: d3e3e3@gmail.com
Cc: "rbridge@postel.org" <rbridge@postel.org>
Subject: Re: [rbridge] draft-eastlake-trill-00
X-BeenThere: rbridge@postel.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <rbridge.postel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge>, <mailto:rbridge-request@postel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/rbridge>
List-Post: <mailto:rbridge@postel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rbridge-request@postel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge>, <mailto:rbridge-request@postel.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2093853501=="
Sender: rbridge-bounces@postel.org
Errors-To: rbridge-bounces@postel.org

Hi Jeff,

That's draft-eastlake-isis-trill-00 but otherwise, you are completely
correct. The RESV area used to fill two bytes (minus the S and L bits). When
it was reduced to one byte, the length expression was not adjusted.

>
Thanks,
Donald

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Jeff Pickering <jeffpick@broadcom.com>wrote:

>  In the text:
>
>
>
>
>
> 2.5 TRILL Neighbor TLV
>
>
>
>    The TRILL Neighbor TLV is used in TRILL-Hellos (see Section 4.1 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eastlake-isis-trill-00#section-4.1>
>
>    below) in place of the IS Neighbor TLV, as specified in Section <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eastlake-isis-trill-00#section->
>
>    4.4.2.1 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eastlake-isis-trill-00#section-> of [RFCtrill <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eastlake-isis-trill-00#ref-RFCtrill>].  This TLV can occur zero, one, or multiple
>
>    times in a TRILL-Hello.  The structure of the TRILL Neighbor TLV is
>
>    as follows:
>
>
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    | Type = TNeigh |                  (1 byte)
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    |   Length      |                  (1 byte)
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    |S|L|  RESV     |                  (1 byte)
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    |                Neighbor RECORDS (1)                           |
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    |                   .................                           |
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    |                Neighbor RECORDS (N)                           |
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>
>
>    The list of neighbors MUST be ordered by MAC address, considering
>
>    each 6-byte MAC address to be an unsigned integer, starting with the
>
>    smallest.  The information present for each neighbor is as follows:
>
>
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    |F|  RESV       |                (1 bytes)
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    |       MTU                   |  (2 bytes)
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>    |   MAC Address                                       | (6 bytes)
>
>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>
>
>    o  Type: TLV Type, set to TRILL-Neighbor TLV 145 [TBD].
>
>
>
>    o  Length: 2 + 9*n, where n is the number of neighbor records.
>
>
>
>
>
> Should length be 1+9*n or is the RESV field 2 bytes?
>


Jeff
>
_______________________________________________
rbridge mailing list
rbridge@postel.org
http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge