[trill] About draft of <The problem statement of RBridge edge group state synchronization>
Haoweiguo <haoweiguo@huawei.com> Fri, 01 March 2013 07:39 UTC
Return-Path: <haoweiguo@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A459E21F8833 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:39:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.731
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.731 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=4.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KXc3rBLRDsH3 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:39:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDEF21F87EA for <trill@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:39:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AQF11052; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:39:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:39:18 +0000
Received: from NKGEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.41) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:39:18 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.101]) by nkgeml410-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.41]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 15:39:14 +0800
From: Haoweiguo <haoweiguo@huawei.com>
To: "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: About draft of <The problem statement of RBridge edge group state synchronization>
Thread-Index: Ac4WT3J8LIq+79DlRimIrnfxQiQrqQ==
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:39:13 +0000
Message-ID: <DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F653B5D@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.135.22.248]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517334F653B5Dnkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [trill] About draft of <The problem statement of RBridge edge group state synchronization>
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 07:39:21 -0000
Hi All, I have posted one draft of <The problem statement of RBridge edge group state synchronization> in January this year. Currently there are Pseudo-Nickname and CMT draft to solve multi-homing problems. But i think it's not enough. Another requirements should also be considered such as multi-chassis LACP... Communication protocol among edge RBs should be introduced to syncronize state and configuration among these RBs. This draft only describes the problems and requirements. Suggestions and comments are welcomed. thanks weiguo