Re: [trill] New draft: draft-mizrahi-trill-loss-delay-00

Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com> Tue, 19 February 2013 09:38 UTC

Return-Path: <talmi@marvell.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D3721F87A4 for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:38:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.800, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NWiAJqjEs64m for <trill@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:38:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na3sys009aog120.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog120.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B96321F8692 for <trill@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:37:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SC-OWA01.marvell.com ([199.233.58.136]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob120.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUSNH9H9oopeVGnA06s6f7xeEyVdbpwa6@postini.com; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:38:02 PST
Received: from YK-HUB01.marvell.com (10.4.102.51) by sc-owa01.marvell.com (10.93.76.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 01:34:13 -0800
Received: from IL-MB01.marvell.com ([10.4.102.53]) by YK-HUB01.marvell.com ([10.4.102.51]) with mapi; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:34:11 +0200
From: Tal Mizrahi <talmi@marvell.com>
To: Gagan Mohan Goel <Gagan_Goel@infosys.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:34:07 +0200
Thread-Topic: New draft: draft-mizrahi-trill-loss-delay-00
Thread-Index: Ac4N5mrEG1XxBAnYSvSlgxyFBe7MxwAkmsFgAAJ5bcA=
Message-ID: <74470498B659FA4687F0B0018C19A89C01A0F951B840@IL-MB01.marvell.com>
References: <74470498B659FA4687F0B0018C19A89C01A0F951B684@IL-MB01.marvell.com> <06D3FFFAA621E5459625E5E757AE9A1B0B8D970A@BLRKECMBX23.ad.infosys.com>
In-Reply-To: <06D3FFFAA621E5459625E5E757AE9A1B0B8D970A@BLRKECMBX23.ad.infosys.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_74470498B659FA4687F0B0018C19A89C01A0F951B840ILMB01marve_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "tsenevir@cisco.com" <tsenevir@cisco.com>, "Donald Eastlake \(d3e3e3@gmail.com\)" <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, "Samer Salam \(ssalam\) \(ssalam@cisco.com\)" <ssalam@cisco.com>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [trill] New draft: draft-mizrahi-trill-loss-delay-00
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:38:04 -0000

Hi Gagan,

Thanks for your comments.
Please see my responses inline.

Tal.

From: Gagan Mohan Goel [mailto:Gagan_Goel@infosys.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 10:24 AM
To: Tal Mizrahi
Cc: tsenevir@cisco.com; Donald Eastlake (d3e3e3@gmail.com); Samer Salam (ssalam) (ssalam@cisco.com); trill@ietf.org
Subject: RE: New draft: draft-mizrahi-trill-loss-delay-00

Hi Tal,

Following are my views on the draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mizrahi-trill-loss-delay.

1) Section 4.2.3 SLR Message Reception

<snip>    The receiver computes the one-way packet delay with respect to a measurement interval. A measurement interval includes a sequence of
   1SLM message. The one-way packet delay is performed by comparing the counter values TXp and RXp at the beginning of the measurement
   interval, and the counter values TXc and RXc at the end of the  measurement interval (Figure 2):
<snip>

I understand that receiver can only calculate the one way packet loss (and not packet delay) with incoming SLM message. I think the above can be modified to:



 The receiver computes the one-way packet loss with respect to a measurement interval. A measurement interval includes a sequence of
   SLM message. The one-way packet loss is performed by comparing the counter values TXp and RXp at the beginning of the measurement
   interval, and the counter values TXc and RXc at the end of the  measurement interval (Figure 2):

[TM] Right. It is indeed a typo.

2) 4.1.2<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mizrahi-trill-loss-delay-00#section-4.1.2>.2>. 1SLM Message Reception

<snip> The receiver MUST maintain a reception counter for each peer MEP and test ID. Upon receiving a 1SLM packet, the receiver MUST verify that:



   o The 1SLM packet is destined to the current MEP.

   o The packet's MD level matches the MEP's MD level.

<snip>
May be another criteria that can be added to handle any transient network loop scenario:
Ø  Discard the message if counter received in the incoming 1SLM message is lower than current RX count for same testID.
[TM] Since packets can in some cases be received out-of-order, this filter may discard 1SLM packets that should be counted.

Regards
Gagan Mohan Goel

From: trill-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tal Mizrahi
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 8:17 PM
To: trill@ietf.org
Cc: tsenevir@cisco.com; Donald Eastlake (d3e3e3@gmail.com); Samer Salam (ssalam) (ssalam@cisco.com)
Subject: [trill] New draft: draft-mizrahi-trill-loss-delay-00

Hi,

We have uploaded a new draft titled "Loss and Delay Measurement in TRILL".

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mizrahi-trill-loss-delay

Comments will be welcome.

Thanks,
Tal.