Re: Minutes are online now!

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Fri, 20 December 2019 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741DA120639 for <tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 07:34:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2QqhvwpvMFP7 for <tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 07:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAEE9120180 for <tsv-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 07:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 200116b82cf138003cdb596f14795d4c.dip.versatel-1u1.de ([2001:16b8:2cf1:3800:3cdb:596f:1479:5d4c]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1iiKIR-0007GQ-Lm; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 16:34:31 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: Minutes are online now!
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-dffQAgM_P+91OLUhtcsdC0O-T9PtAYv+XAzgg-atgAng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 16:34:31 +0100
Cc: "tsv-area@ietf.org >> tsv-area@ietf.org" <tsv-area@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <41F8720F-7FBA-41FD-B557-7F5A644A8DA8@kuehlewind.net>
References: <97D39077-4937-42E5-8AD3-B07F939359E0@kuehlewind.net> <CAKKJt-dffQAgM_P+91OLUhtcsdC0O-T9PtAYv+XAzgg-atgAng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1576856073;67858f56;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1iiKIR-0007GQ-Lm
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-area/ae5GmpSWW_aDb2vXnrJ6jKYItME>
X-BeenThere: tsv-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Transport and Services Area Mailing List <tsv-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-area>, <mailto:tsv-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-area>, <mailto:tsv-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 15:34:35 -0000

Hi Spencer,

Thanks for your review. I uploaded a new revision!

Mirja


> On 17. Dec 2019, at 02:52, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Mirja, 
> 
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 4:07 AM Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The minutes are online now:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/minutes-106-tsvarea-00
> 
> If you were at the session, please check and let us know if there are any edits needed!
> 
> I'm always hard to summarize :-) 
> 
> For 
> 
>   Spencer Dawkins: I wish I had explicitly asked for keepalives when I was AD. People don't want to let us down by quitting. 
> 
> I'd suggest 
> 
>   Spencer Dawkins: I wish I had explicitly asked for keepalives when I was AD, to periodically make sure chairs are willing to continue to serve. People don't want to let us down by quitting. 
> 
> For 
> 
>   Spencer: We had ops/mgmt there because there was nowhere else to have it. Now there's a WG for it, and they've already started arguing about measuring QUIC. 
> 
> I'd suggest 
> 
>   Spencer: We had QUIC ops/mgmt considerations in the QUIC working group charter because there was nowhere else to put it. Now that Media Operations (MOPS) has been chartered, they're already talking about measuring troubleshooting QUIC from an operator perspective in their first working group session. Maybe this document should go into MOPS?
> 
> (And I understood Mark Nottingham to say my suggestion was "interesting", but I haven't gone back to Meetecho to verify that)
> 
> Best, 
> 
> Spencer
>