Re: [Tsv-art] Open review assignments in tsvart

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Wed, 12 February 2020 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC93120048 for <tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:53:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0IdvKJpyvPAj for <tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:53:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 940AD12001E for <tsv-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:53:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=iSiHpW6b++FGILg9lvRB14RVh/24teV/lka8ykNBSxE=; b=nLF/2AQ1TMG2EFw5GwpiLbfWK qxZjhrnhl354LjfJ+fTsuFx9Bl1fz9JFbornnCZy6R/kFdPYVzMx1PE6Op8G1bszWZ0Bt9pyQKfiI CtEkSyD3/vAsId+PJaVbjMWKqg4UMtBbuaKxbvTKm9UYRlD6vWS2Jj4DwgbbZRlkio2X9ZXUvX+hx pN6ZZmFPMhUkVa4X/pTM8oqzMhBa4TyNrY2KXEg+4ScmhqCSPOvav3fyqY1cPxBryHteSvgOe5/rV yCW29deAmxwA7B4W6xoIoPyt/7D94L1Cd+IhNFlDI/8kH5r9JqRXganK54wNuIMnED7+IxMBXw79g KCichVStQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:61866 helo=[192.168.1.10]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1j1sS1-002pDX-UD; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 08:53:18 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <e551334c-6052-979f-5f9b-b56d09f82690@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:53:12 -0800
Cc: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, tsv-art@ietf.org, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7A4ABA7E-6582-4B65-BAA9-438F7774AEAC@strayalpha.com>
References: <4d2b8403e137d5c8234513087097869d@strayalpha.com> <F0201C10-AA80-4DE3-86EB-9B1C52E88F43@kuehlewind.net> <356fece747321dfaba8b8bed4615dca8@strayalpha.com> <7799BC09-A4EC-4CFE-ABF7-A9B3F8CF4EC5@kuehlewind.net> <283d7741-3b49-6d69-28f3-c6bbd67e7a93@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <1EF663D5-E019-4958-A799-507A41F08C86@kuehlewind.net> <e551334c-6052-979f-5f9b-b56d09f82690@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/74JOEk7BwMmYdurECM7_ULnLpkY>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] Open review assignments in tsvart
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:53:23 -0000

Again, LAST?

How about FIRST, first?

Joe

> On Feb 12, 2020, at 1:29 AM, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> I will post the LC to the TSVWG list, and let's see if anyone responds.
> 
> Gorry
> 
> On 12/02/2020 08:59, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
>> Hi Gorry,
>> 
>> I wasn’t aware of that. Can you maybe just forward the IETF last call to the TSVWG list, or should I do that? Or did you proposed to run an “official” wg last call but that seems rather unusual for non-wg document, no…?
>> 
>> Mirja
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 12. Feb 2020, at 09:11, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
>>> 
>>> If I recall, previous changes to the port services registry were last-called in TSVWG, such as RFC 6335 . There's still time to do that, unless there is a need to do this differently.
>>> 
>>> Gorry
>>> 
>>> On 11/02/2020 09:54, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
>>>> Hi Joe,
>>>> 
>>>> As I said, there was a misunderstanding between Alexey and me and this went slightly to early to IETF last call. However, we have a 4 weeks comment period and therefore I think there is plenty of time to provide feedback.
>>>> 
>>>> What do you mean by “first call”? This is an individual submission, so there is no working group and as such it only has this one last call. We already good some feedback when we posted the first version of this draft and requested feedback from relevant parties since then. The IETF last call is now exactly the time for the community to provide feedback and have any discussion if needed. As I said I’m happy to address your comments to make the intention and focus of this effort clearer, so maybe we can working together on the respective wording! However, I also hope that we will get more feedback from the broader community in this last call!
>>>> 
>>>> Mirja
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 11. Feb 2020, at 01:26, Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I responded to your private query to the ports team the same day you posted it - Dec 13, 2019.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You didn't respond to my feedback until this morning - and now it's in last call?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Where was the *first* call?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do I need to make an official request on the IETF list that this doc be withdrawn from last call and submitted for open discussion for a reasonable period before jumping to this step?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Joe
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2020-02-10 10:38, Mirja Kühlewind (IETF) wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Joe,
>>>>>>  As this document has been around for a while and therefore had a couple of discussions with some relevant parties, we decided to start IETF last call. There was a bit of a misunderstanding between me and Alexey as shepherding AD and he startet it today while I was planning for another update. I just published a new version a few hours ago which also partially addresses your comment but I'm of course open for further feedback and improvements.
>>>>>>  Mirja
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 10.02.2020 um 19:33 schrieb Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi, all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What kind of "last call" is system-ports in?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I am aware of only off-list discussions on this draft happening with the ports team (and IMO not going well).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 2020-02-10 08:33, Wesley Eddy via Datatracker wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The following reviewers have assignments:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Last calls:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Reviewer               LC end     Draft
>>>>>>> Gorry Fairhurst        2020-03-09 draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-04
>>>>>>> Jana Iyengar           2020-02-17 draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa-15
>>>>>>> Colin Perkins          2020-01-30 draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-11
>>>>>>> Ian Swett              2020-02-20 draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-07
>>>>>>> Joseph Touch           2020-02-20 draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-12
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Early review requests:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Reviewer               Due        Draft
>>>>>>> Ian Swett              2019-10-31 draft-ietf-rift-rift-08
>>>>>>> Brian Trammell         2020-02-28 draft-ietf-lsvr-l3dl-03
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Next in the reviewer rotation:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   Wesley Eddy
>>>>>>>   Bernard Aboba
>>>>>>>   Olivier Bonaventure
>>>>>>>   David Black
>>>>>>>   Bob Briscoe
>>>>>>>   Martin Duke
>>>>>>>   Michael Tüxen
>>>>>>>   Yoshifumi Nishida
>>>>>>>   Jana Iyengar
>>>>>>>   Joerg Ott
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Tsv-art mailing list
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tsv-art@ietf.org
>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Tsv-art mailing list
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tsv-art@ietf.org
>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Tsv-art mailing list
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Tsv-art@ietf.org
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Tsv-art mailing list
>>>> 
>>>> Tsv-art@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tsv-art mailing list
>>> Tsv-art@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tsv-art mailing list
>> Tsv-art@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art