[Tsv-art] Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05
=?utf-8?q?Michael_T=C3=BCxen_=3Ctuexen=40fh-muenster=2Ede=3E?=@ietfa.amsl.com Thu, 16 February 2017 18:18 UTC
Return-Path: <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB241294F5; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:18:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "Michael Tüxen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>"@ietfa.amsl.com
To: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.44.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148726910816.1075.17105591789960030239.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:18:28 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/BZT0BkgbmQB5uY9msd2we6MX36w>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:52:11 -0800
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion.all@ietf.org
Subject: [Tsv-art] Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:18:28 -0000
Reviewer: Michael Tüxen Review result: Ready with Nits I've reviewed this document as part of the transport area directorate's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors for their information and to allow them to address any issues raised. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review together with any other last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review. This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. Running https://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/idnits.pyht reports * The abstract seems to contain references ([RFC7624]), which it shouldn't. * Unused Reference: 'RFC4301' The discussion of RFC 7871 in section 4 could be improved to allow readers not knowing the EDNS0 option to get the point. Either provide an abstract description or refer to RFC 6891.
- [Tsv-art] Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata… =?utf-8?q?Michael_T=C3=BCxen_=3Ctuexen=40fh-muenster=2Ede=3E?=
- Re: [Tsv-art] Review of draft-hardie-privsec-meta… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Tsv-art] Review of draft-hardie-privsec-meta… Michael Tuexen