[Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases-04

Michael Scharf via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 08 February 2024 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E46C14F738; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 08:08:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael Scharf via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, tvr@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.4.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <170740849234.20668.9631581666463305338@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Michael Scharf <michael.scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 08:08:12 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/Fp8na3LsYmn4G8e7wH6jVzB4Bfs>
Subject: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases-04
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 16:08:12 -0000

Reviewer: Michael Scharf
Review result: Ready with Issues

This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.

This informational document introduces Time-Variant Routing Use Cases. The text
is well-written and easy to read. Most of the use cases are fairly obvious. In
any case, there are no specific TSV-ART issues, i.e., problems related to
Internet transport protocols.

Yet, more in general, I don't understand why Section 6 is included in this
document. This section may easily become outdated by other documents and future
RFCs. Its content is also neither mentioned in the title nor introduced in the
abstract. The whole section 6 could just be removed without any impact on the
remaining parts of the document.