IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 28 August 2018 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACF0130E05; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 12:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qViMGl4OrcOB; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 12:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22b.google.com (mail-yb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B36712F295; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 12:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id z12-v6so1063558ybg.9; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 12:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SYRjW+8DiJLPwqzBPyCpSRJ+t1uq01oOXINSHwnvVQg=; b=mfdn4QIXe7nP1L98nCC4NqzghLvrmazfuHy5sXEX0QO6NaWzkB69W0n4d48mMgpkCj w7f56IfTsCX0NGXsmV3TZLCod0QKoq+SxRHSQgdfV9sOrY0VuRPyq5GZaHR6CYB0ApZc aZHlU67mIt7eP20cuIdGnP7QP8g3IW2xhoTIPJyXBqFeCPEWFeCftdtFm+GxWT5lhO8V DTwA/32JHeLfbAQVDRT+7RA7bPk/MVkjtTjZRM38yMoHhDSI5LW4l1QIGOJia9AdIX18 7K+pdv3WWSP1QproZelr9zedjfWDtI3BFqzL3X49aIWMvjh/C9hwKrZXMEz92HSry/Bk d3SQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SYRjW+8DiJLPwqzBPyCpSRJ+t1uq01oOXINSHwnvVQg=; b=iznQ6c4Dg6l1hgfigvH9DrCFzfAUwKVOK72yxeCWtGxUwoPEhqkNYfH5VAInEee53S nDwJ621EAMTVP+YLFfWjmipnEp/Ud/kKxIWeSAYN+fxcAeVHgosk3B2dnYXEpA4H4bTU MkA6HaD88Kq4EY2Rr26iD63p9Wwa0oAgAgBsqR7wpoFdstZU2+3JACdPb/LLMfsTf0sA DO0BEI1bwi0K0mmoVBQN08KIe+Ycjd+KBcRPkNpMcmKQd8WiR5uutFk2vhleDOnXsTIx /g9G1GchjVz/knOZroi1Yu9IYVaZojGtjYeZ78KSprvk51rwX1+bDP03p1vGnKdAVjoI hN5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AU/XSLFw7pzET5ea6ZorsOOm2Xoh2zSFO80HhMc73A9IP/1SMP m1rD4ur818guIZEWDlzaLwL3dDgQ48DeL682zjU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYKvAQed7KGrFWon9BStZzVQAsRLarbdTx0UuWW3tWUCXoZokGFF+D/FafYOSpTJgzmwC1SiwpovQ5wsYPlX3Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:c343:: with SMTP id t64-v6mr1678606ybf.399.1535484988276; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 12:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <153538054829.30074.15428909912816972228@ietfa.amsl.com> <ED34F830-1FEF-42BB-BB6E-805D724AB339@gmail.com> <79FA52C8-94AC-43CE-B052-9F921A65E0D5@trammell.ch> <23680BD5-0DD3-4404-888D-D1C78A0A437D@gmail.com> <130902C2-9CEE-4931-8957-D32446723B89@trammell.ch> <CF5E3C7B-E492-4EE9-A2E6-A2D823C6610F@gmail.com> <1514B576-87FD-475F-B6C5-BBA1C2CA94ED@trammell.ch> <CE7ECD23-E8A2-4D48-B752-0D246C02F27E@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE7ECD23-E8A2-4D48-B752-0D246C02F27E@gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:36:17 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-d-SJ5BZMnPRB2ZnXP+WWZe5MMBcoA+H6coGRRJAR9YeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis.all@ietf.org, tsv-art@ietf.org, IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>, lisp@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000048c5b4057483f5de"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/hV3BCjLmMv83jWomlli9s77Q7Fw>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 19:36:31 -0000

Hi, Dino,

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:49 AM Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I'd suggest inserting a new paragraph after paragraph 2 of section 5,
> something like:
> >
> >
> > NEW:
> >
> > As LISP uses UDP encapsulation to carry traffic between ITRs and ETRs
> across the Internet, implementors should be aware of the provisions of
> [RFC8085], especially those given in section 3.1.11 on congestion control
> for UDP tunneling.
>
> Consider it added to Section 5 “LISP Encapsulation Details”, last
> paragraph.
>

Thanks for that. It's the right thing to do (at least in my ballot
position) :-)

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email