IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsv-art] TSV Triage team: Review of IETF LC documents as of 10/11

Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 26 October 2017 07:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA92A13B138 for <tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fbQiz7Mstxd7 for <tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 667E813B039 for <tsv-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id r196so6380325wmf.2 for <tsv-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xmNZxFuT6lhG5yoIb+CIaGRLuGaIZRZK2CTz6fMqPr4=; b=K4scsUSPYu81FpOffoqliCcoGzP2LaCGAfFkifp2nzjCWSzQrnER3TJFuHrZfLlg8h +maLn60RpAhACIT94I4AdM8EoNLcJfNCP0BDTlNJDg+rX03PFJSeqbLRLR7fiEWcBd+s OuaXLMNkFSr0yBBZ5csrFXg4wISOhyWUX5ECv2DCWtnmgyW1jrVYnhZ/H0flA2aW4aT2 BgZXWF0mp4MHI4t7urY+eqGsQJ7lrC4AZ26GUNDUR23zCdrlbRzyVM0CIiqZNnVEGNDS 6L9Ooz/5SbyWcL1eljfwt4b8gTgUj020DkA8dtN31PjENYyVAY1vfi5KnQSZh2PxEeo6 MEMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xmNZxFuT6lhG5yoIb+CIaGRLuGaIZRZK2CTz6fMqPr4=; b=ivybVvzWYaWC1+C8JrVXS1KP3yP+Pb75qCARx5UrCIO+woAKCZkOgQ/ZM9kuL1Sxu3 VDjyzE4/z0q9bRV1Nbn9vVU/b9gZDPXgGpuq2izB3fCnKAz1Bt58RkOxpFNtb1MqNhsG 39qu22ZVdy34h1kUEWo3Q2liWG3IZvL38upPQIHZ20a3TnbSkd+Js8qvhvZ3fiVKN/AY tknSrWUA5fMndu4ed800TQabr949IUYzpl9a8Coy7kXp7+OdRktUwoD2uHbqH9+asIqE 7eOUAp0jAAUOwt4rXjvJZ6W+/bTAzh5Y4UNnBEXBOpaTVaBVz+VDDCUyBO2jzbjGzZfX HYkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaX30qQZ3xc5KmRFJs6SdCiySPpO8CZ37tZE2c8QBf8e0PVYjvYU P/ff8Gy0erSpxpz0WyATnpDMTA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Qqw3uiWvvXEa8SJ6B16HmSeRxl2tl7bxJZrmnyLjJgWcxoj5LGyRniC67aKt8twPSwbI/UXg==
X-Received: by 10.80.213.131 with SMTP id v3mr13292577edi.256.1509004752666; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2003:74:cf3f:7155:d5b8:b4a4:368c:799c? (p200300061373C155D5B8B4A4368C799C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:6:1373:c155:d5b8:b4a4:368c:799c]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g49sm3058762edg.71.2017.10.26.00.59.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: tsv-art@ietf.org
References: <641815bd-11d4-3742-a2f4-a1b63e239b36@gmail.com> <07958751-5EC5-4B59-86BD-A5D40201EEAE@strayalpha.com> <bd0bfa57-99da-2f42-7f92-11b116a056b6@kuehlewind.net>
From: Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <61cebe58-e0c3-4819-73a0-5e0b03a25934@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 09:59:10 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <bd0bfa57-99da-2f42-7f92-11b116a056b6@kuehlewind.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/mDP1796pE1SusIvlkw9kWxiPyz0>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] TSV Triage team: Review of IETF LC documents as of 10/11
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:59:18 -0000

Hi Mirja, and Joe,

Am 12.10.17 um 10:34 schrieb Mirja Kühlewind:
> Hi Joe,
> 
> not sure, what your actual request is to the triage team but they 
> usually don't assign tsv document for tsv-art review. Also your concern 
> seems to be quite fundamentally about the approach taken by the working 
> group and it seems simply too late to change anything about this now as 
> the document(s) are in IETF last call.

I did put the ENO and TCPCRYPT docs on the list, as I did wonder if 
there is a need for more review.

However, this was purely a question, as I wasn't sure how the review 
quality was (not blaming anybody, but I haven't followed the review 
process thoroughly).

Cheers,

   Martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email