IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework-08

"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Sun, 17 February 2019 02:54 UTC

Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EB21294FA; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 18:54:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=packetizer.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uao8zxwgsX3J; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 18:54:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [IPv6:2600:1f18:24d6:2e01:e842:9b2b:72a2:d2c6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 442C7126D00; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 18:54:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from authuser (localhost [127.0.0.1])
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1550372076; bh=KTjeG/jetWYTX/D5SZgI4zCN931+dFT6/CklYJ6NgZs=; h=From:To:Subject:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To; b=fvoWZqVfrEFMacInV2VUSE9eg0UQphdZVBqRuOEPN9w8E7gUVsy4R6JWBtSgeqaiV hrHkyJDsjLbdLF5Eg9d94DU28JVnP8xXmhjz7GXkw1LaCSMUU7iLS7ggKySfEQv7RV xRxupa7W+9Zm0paggZ5XT09SNr7piX0TcTYevIIE=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Cc: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej=40packetizer.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, tsv-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework.all@ietf.org, perc@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 02:54:32 +0000
Message-Id: <em82eabc05-548f-49ff-bc0e-17f88384f2d1@sydney>
In-Reply-To: <5C67DEB1.6020204@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
References: <154930159870.28630.16457371613620717540@ietfa.amsl.com> <em99f9a1ec-e503-4a74-a0c9-0b58b55d0a1e@sydney> <5C67DEB1.6020204@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Reply-To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
User-Agent: eM_Client/7.2.34208.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/prm2VLe2D8U8c5xbzmhoXTDkErc>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-perc-private-media-framework-08
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 02:54:47 -0000

Gorry,

>>Most of these have a reference that follows them (RTCP was the one exception, I think). Are you saying we should fully state what SRTP stands for, for example, or are you saying references were missing?
>>
>RFCs are read by people with many backgrounds for many reasons. With this in mind, I was just suggesting to expand the acconyms.

Understood, and done. It will appear that way in the next publication.

>>I appended that paragraph with the following:
>>
>>"While resource consumption attacks cannot be mitigated entirely, rate-limiting packets might help reduce the effectiveness of such attacks."
>>
>>I'm open to alternative wording, but I think that should suffice.
>>
>Maybe /effectiveness/ could be /impact/ ?
>... I'd personally prefer to not suggest attacks are effective, but happy with some such words.

Sure, that change sounds good. I'm always the optimist, but optimism in 
the wrong direction isn't so positive. :)

Thanks!
Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email