[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6056 (2750)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 13 March 2011 18:48 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC203A6B54 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.428
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.428 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.172, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8T2mQm8276mr for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4FD3A68B3 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 35D74E070A; Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: michael.larsen@tieto.com, fernando@gont.com.ar, ietfdbh@comcast.net, lars.eggert@nokia.com, wes@mti-systems.com, jmpolk@cisco.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6056 (2750)
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20110313184954.35D74E070A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:49:54 -0700
Cc: bzeeb+ieft@zabbadoz.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:48:32 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6056, "Recommendations for Transport-Protocol Port Randomization". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6056&eid=2750 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb+ieft@zabbadoz.net> Section: 3.3 Original Text ------------- 3.3.1. Algorithm 1: Simple Port Randomization Algorithm - if(check_suitable_port(port)) 3.3.2. Algorithm 2: Another Simple Port Randomization Algorithm - if(check_suitable_port(port)) Corrected Text -------------- 3.3.1. Algorithm 1: Simple Port Randomization Algorithm + if(check_suitable_port(next_ephemeral)) 3.3.2. Algorithm 2: Another Simple Port Randomization Algorithm + if(check_suitable_port(next_ephemeral)) Notes ----- For neither Algorithm 1 or 2 the pseudo code defines "port" as a valid variable. The variable passed to check_suitable_port() should be "next_ephemeral" in these cases. It looks like a copy and paste error. The technical meaning is still clear. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6056 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-09) -------------------------------------- Title : Recommendations for Transport-Protocol Port Randomization Publication Date : January 2011 Author(s) : M. Larsen, F. Gont Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE Source : Transport Area Working Group Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6056 (2750) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6056 (2750) Fernando Gont