Re: [Tsvwg] [NSIS] Discussion of Router Alert Option in Routing Area

"Hancock, Robert" <robert.hancock@roke.co.uk> Mon, 17 November 2008 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tsvwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F07B3A69BA; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:24:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B163A69BA; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:24:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.854
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.745, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BYUlqO+uJIUt; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:24:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rsys002x.roke.co.uk (rsys002x.roke.co.uk [193.118.201.109]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC10E3A6808; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:24:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk ([193.118.193.85]) by rsys002x.roke.co.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mAHGOBnk005403; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:24:11 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:24:11 -0000
Message-ID: <A632AD91CF90F24A87C42F6B96ADE5C50157AFD4@rsys005a.comm.ad.roke.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <D879988C-D670-48B6-BFCA-E9073F629ABB@cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [NSIS] [Tsvwg] Discussion of Router Alert Option in Routing Area
Thread-Index: AclIzLXmPsSy4b34Te6I33p9pqZDvAAAv43g
References: <49217E26.9050700@ericsson.com> <D879988C-D670-48B6-BFCA-E9073F629ABB@cisco.com>
From: "Hancock, Robert" <robert.hancock@roke.co.uk>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>, NSIS <nsis@ietf.org>
X-roke-co-uk-MailScanner-ID: mAHGOBnk005403
X-MailScanner-roke-co-uk: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-roke-co-uk-SpamCheck:
X-MailScanner-From: robert.hancock@roke.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] [NSIS] Discussion of Router Alert Option in Routing Area
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

also FYI, i've posted a draft about the (experimental) use of the
RAO for GIST. some of this is the specification itself, but there's
also a fair amount of the background analysis of why one might or
might not want to use something RAO-like for packet interception.

see:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hancock-nsis-gist-rao-00.txt

robert h. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:nsis-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
> Sent: 17 November 2008 15:53
> To: Magnus Westerlund; tsvwg IETF list; NSIS
> Subject: Re: [NSIS] [Tsvwg] Discussion of Router Alert Option 
> in Routing Area
> 
> Hi,
> 
> FYI, a new version of the "RAO Considerations and Usage" 
> draft is available at:
> http://www.tla-group.com/~loa/draft-rahman-rtg-router-alert-co
> nsiderations-00.txt
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Francois
> 
> On 17 Nov 2008, at 08:22, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to make a heads up announcement to people interested in the 
> > Router Alert discussion. This is on the agenda for the Routing Area 
> > Open meeting on Thursday 1pm-3pm. Please attend and 
> participate in the 
> > discussion to provide a transport view on this topic.
> >
> > Room: Salon F
> > Agenda:
> >
> >   1. WG Reports (chairs)
> >
> >   2. Reduced Backus-Naur Form (Adrian Farrel)
> >      Background reading
> >      
> > 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-rtg-common-bnf-07.txt
> >
> >   3. RAO considered dangerous (Ashok Narayanan)
> >      Background reading
> >
> > 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rahman-rtg-router-alert-dang
> > erous-00.txt
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Magnus Westerlund
> >
> > IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> > Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nsis mailing list
> nsis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
>