discovery and draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports
Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 16 February 2011 16:34 UTC
Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DFE3A6E74 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:34:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gsphhZNNClCT for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:34:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8183A6E6D for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:34:17 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAL+LW02rR7Ht/2dsb2JhbACEHaFMc6BXinGQYYEng0F2BIUIhwI
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,480,1291593600"; d="scan'208";a="330775455"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2011 16:34:45 +0000
Received: from dhcp-171-70-255-219.cisco.com (dhcp-171-70-255-219.cisco.com [171.70.255.219]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p1GGYjDp018346 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:34:45 GMT
Message-ID: <4D5BFC8F.1090506@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:34:23 -0800
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: discovery and draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:34:17 -0000
Hi, The current draft doesn't really delve sufficiently into discovery of services. Currently it seems that every other request I deal with has some sort of discovery component to it. I would like us to consider gating normatively on draft-cheshire-dnsext-sd and requiring its use for discovery. Eliot
- discovery and draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports Eliot Lear
- Re: discovery and draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports Lars Eggert