Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-03.txt
Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Mon, 28 February 2022 12:34 UTC
Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3044D3A101A for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 04:34:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sf-B5BphD69J for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 04:33:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.19.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAFD3A10D6 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 04:33:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 665E11B0009C; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:33:16 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <904a7b54-1b67-d2e9-4dba-f81a43798978@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:33:15 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <164578863105.24459.298900087249411180@ietfa.amsl.com> <29133_1646045545_621CA969_29133_321_7_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303549BA6C@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <29133_1646045545_621CA969_29133_321_7_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303549BA6C@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/41yUAnWyku7jTcseOCiVtZNVyIQ>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-03.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:34:00 -0000
On 28/02/2022 10:52, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote: > Hi Gorry, > > Thank you for taking care of the comments. I like in particular how you recorded the outcome of the nonce discussion in the security section. I consider that all my previous comments are adequately addressed. > > One last comment in reference to this part from the udp-options spec (which covers RES/REQ): > > == > >> All other options (without a "*") MAY be implemented, and their > use SHOULD be determined either out-of-band or negotiated. > == > > I wonder whether it is useful to be explicit how retransmission is managed by the sender when no response is received from a peer. Med, I'm not sure what you suggest this time, so this not be the answer you are asking ... While a UDP application could itself retransmit (some) datagrams that it somehow determined to be lost, I don't think there is any single approach, and so I'd prefer to suggest that the easy approach to DPLPMTUD is not to send a probe with any application data, or at least not with any data that needs to be reliably sent. The DPLPMTUD probes themselves are not really retransmitted, rather, if a probe times-out or is discovered lost, then a new probe is then scheduled. This could have the same size, or the next size chosen. It will have new token. What text might be helpful to add? Gorry > Thanks. > > Cheers, > Med > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : I-D-Announce <i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de >> internet-drafts@ietf.org >> Envoyé : vendredi 25 février 2022 12:31 >> À : i-d-announce@ietf.org >> Cc : tsvwg@ietf.org >> Objet : I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-03.txt >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Transport Area Working Group WG of the >> IETF. >> >> Title : Datagram PLPMTUD for UDP Options >> Authors : Godred Fairhurst >> Tom Jones >> Filename : draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-03.txt >> Pages : 12 >> Date : 2022-02-25 >> >> Abstract: >> This document specifies how a UDP Options sender implements Datagram >> Packetization Layer Path Maximum Transmission Unit Discovery >> (DPLPMTUD) as a robust method for Path Maximum Transmission Unit >> discovery. This method uses the UDP Options packetization layer. It >> allows a datagram application to discover the largest size of >> datagram that can be sent across a specific network path. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud/ >> >> There is also an htmlized version available at: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options- >> dplpmtud-03 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud- >> 03 >> >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet- >> drafts >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> I-D-Announce mailing list >> I-D-Announce@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you.
- [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-… internet-drafts
- Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-opti… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-opti… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-opti… mohamed.boucadair