IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] WG: New Version Notification - draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-05.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 19 February 2014 04:02 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF9D1A0310 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:02:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PTZ6M9xI8aJm for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:02:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-x22d.google.com (mail-pb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF361A0309 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:02:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id un15so17733067pbc.32 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:02:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=52p0mkNDs1zZu+hxNQH1guHrRr8ctNq4Tv0k/0+KiMU=; b=n3IlN3qxMs/kOMGG/mRFFoNQJWFLjE9GwkH+lqs7NWWXuMM51PJXvSbMJlcAAJpUzR Ab+qdKoQpSbc84uiM0oUR6T484vrm5qJcrj9mFltrYN0DdwhJ/UpWmYNuWD5htKfhpIw JYsIH4jwX89+1vIB9uXmAQaFTPvI2mqru0lPN7kRnKZVQhyVM302NnwVpVHN0DUOaXMg yLbFVUaJ8xXzSLV8zqgtsk/6jcd5tCV/vK3lgph2+wVxRUssDB1WAMO2ePRTU+I10n0i iEvxBcThNMmQ0V2PmEl337Mq6ihFcgtmcfaiggQInJPMvdopfHEAN6ApGm16oZJf2DE+ sm3A==
X-Received: by 10.66.149.231 with SMTP id ud7mr37702390pab.8.1392782524885; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:02:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] ([111.69.192.200]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm61227557pbw.26.2014.02.18.20.02.02 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:02:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <53042CAA.3030902@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:01:46 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de
References: <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F50253E59731@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM>
In-Reply-To: <CA7A7C64CC4ADB458B74477EA99DF6F50253E59731@HE111643.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/426lZ0tWNGAz_x6_Z7RpzPn8YqA
Cc: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] WG: New Version Notification - draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-05.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 04:02:09 -0000

Rüdiger,

I don't have time for a full review before London, but I think
the goals of the document are now much clearer and it's probably
as good a proposal as is possible in the somewhat messy real world.

Of course a pair of providers could always negotiate a more
detailed interconnect agreement if they wanted, but this seems
like a reasonable default approach.

Regards
   Brian

On 15/02/2014 01:00, Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de wrote:
> Gorry, all,
> 
> version -05 of diffserv-intercon saw a major review. It is more focused on explaining the proposed solution and how it fits with IETF and other standards. 
> 
> I'd appreciate a review by a volunteer and comments in general, as I'd like to discuss accepting this document as a WG draft at the upcoming meeting.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ruediger
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
> Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Februar 2014 11:47
> An: Geib, Rüdiger; draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon@tools.ietf.org; mls.ietf@gmail.com
> Betreff: New Version Notification - draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-05.txt
> 
> 
> A new version (-05) has been submitted for draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-05.txt
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon/
> 
> Diff from previous version:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-05
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> IETF Secretariat.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email