Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5865 (3194)

[Fred Baker <[e-mail]>]

I am not opposed to the erratum.

On Apr 17, 2012, at 12:24 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:

> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5865,
> "A Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) for Capacity-Admitted Traffic".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5865&eid=3194
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Sergey Antipov <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 2.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   There are at least six major ways that capacity admission is done or
> 
>   has been proposed to be done for real-time applications.  Each will
> 
>   be described below, and Section 3 will judge which ones are likely to
> 
>   meet the requirements of the Admitted Telephony service class.  These
> 
>   include:
> 
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   There are at least six major ways that capacity admission is done or
> 
>   has been proposed to be done for real-time applications.  Each will
> 
>   be described below, and Section 2.3 will judge which ones are likely to
> 
>   meet the requirements of the Admitted Telephony service class.  These
> 
>   include:
> 
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Section 2.3 is the one, which recommends capacity admission procedures, while Section 3 summarizes proposed changes.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5865 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-admitted-realtime-dscp-07)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : A Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) for Capacity-Admitted Traffic
> Publication Date    : May 2010
> Author(s)           : F. Baker, J. Polk, M. Dolly
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Transport Area Working Group
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG