[Tsvwg] About draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-tunnel as WG item?

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Wed, 17 September 2008 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tsvwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB043A6922; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3083A679C for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.638, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74gJdMiEN8vU for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCCE3A6922 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,416,1217808000"; d="scan'208";a="86837784"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Sep 2008 14:43:18 +0000
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m8HEhHSG026428; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:43:17 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8HEhGCX001609; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:43:17 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:40:20 -0700
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com ([10.21.64.83]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:40:19 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:40:34 -0500
To: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <XFE-SJC-212HD7PQ0rs0000f450@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Sep 2008 14:40:20.0250 (UTC) FILETIME=[4F3047A0:01C918D3]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=647; t=1221662597; x=1222526597; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22James=20M.=20Polk=22=20<jmpolk@cisco.com> |Subject:=20About=20draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-tunnel=20as=20W G=20item? |Sender:=20; bh=d+zgDHuwpzNXkvC0SyJC8AqW23jwzNGr8NOBCBwdwJo=; b=eB4xrKgJBsGk5/ws1p9uQDOCd8g3pls9oQcMxXOV4lsnfQhNCyN8lEBSzo l1M3QiHQ3P9c+w63Uc249Glro821w1TpMJnsnWfq593zzZgswJ0V2vc7HnA+ +YPsRH94eH/MTchYG3f3JQeM+DaTYPyZLOP9tHp1iA+tOGn0/rY4w=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=jmpolk@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Subject: [Tsvwg] About draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-tunnel as WG item?
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

WG

There has been recent support for this item to become a WG item.  The 
chairs have no issues with this ID other than making sure no one has 
a problem with it.

Therefore, WG, if there is anyone that objects to this ID becoming a 
WG item, please object now to the chairs.  Otherwise, the chairs will 
do the necessary work to make this a WG item before the next meeting.

A reasonable timeframe for responses is 2 weeks, starting now - 
therefore this issue closes Oct 1st.


Cheers,
James
IETF TSVWG co-chair

              ***********************************
     "It should NEVER be inconvenient to do the right thing"