[tsvwg] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6335 (4999)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 04 March 2020 11:30 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4726C3A0CCF; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 03:30:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.999, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8oPkOJ-tHdse; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 03:30:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58E9C3A0CC8; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 03:30:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A855CF40725; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 03:30:26 -0800 (PST)
To: mnot@mnot.net, michelle.cotton@icann.org, lars.eggert@nokia.com, touch@isi.edu, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, cheshire@apple.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ietf@kuehlewind.net, iesg@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20200304113026.A855CF40725@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 03:30:26 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/6niY6vaCTbnclvBULAW19mUrPjs>
Subject: [tsvwg] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6335 (4999)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 11:30:49 -0000

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC6335, "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4999

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical

Reported by: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date Reported: 2017-04-19
Held by: Mirja Kühlewind (IESG)

Section: GLOBAL

Original Text
-------------


Corrected Text
--------------


Notes
-----
Many port number assignments are to individuals, but the document does not
contemplate how they should be handled when the assignee is dead or
otherwise can't be contacted. 

The most obvious procedure to follow is a transfer (8.5), but that requires 
de-assignment (8.2), and that doesn't cover the case above.

--------------------------------------
RFC6335 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry
Publication Date    : August 2011
Author(s)           : M. Cotton, L. Eggert, J. Touch, M. Westerlund, S. Cheshire
Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Source              : Transport Area Working Group
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG