Re: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-00.txt
Randall Stewart <randall@stewart.chicago.il.us> Sun, 05 August 2001 09:14 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA10757 for <tsvwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 05:14:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA29563; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 04:39:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA29534 for <tsvwg@ns.ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 04:39:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com [171.71.163.10]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA10449 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 04:38:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mira-sjc5-2.cisco.com (mira-sjc5-2.cisco.com [171.71.163.16]) by sj-msg-core-4.cisco.com (8.11.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id f758dF312888; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 01:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stewart.chicago.il.us (ssh-sj1.cisco.com [171.68.225.134]) by mira-sjc5-2.cisco.com (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id ASV01866 (AUTH rrs); Sun, 5 Aug 2001 01:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3B6D0625.D93700EC@stewart.chicago.il.us>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 03:39:01 -0500
From: Randall Stewart <randall@stewart.chicago.il.us>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ivan.Arias-Rodriguez@nokia.com
CC: tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-00.txt
References: <E73DD1C4EDB0D84889A4E589B499A8A110B760@esebe001.NOE.Nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: tsvwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Ivan: Well.. I got the reference from the same RFC you looked at :) So an error is amplified :) I will make both of your changes in the next pass of the document.. R Ivan.Arias-Rodriguez@nokia.com wrote: > > Hi all! > > Because of some work I'm doing now, I was looking for the standard > in which CRC-16 was specified... After some time I managed to get that ITU > standard, in which both CRC-16 and CRC-32 are defined, which is ITU-T > V.42... Then, some time later I thought that I had been quite silly since > the reference should appear in the sctpcsum draft... So, I have gone there, > but the reference is another one, V.41... Just because I'm so curious I have > gone and checked that other standard and guess what I have found... The > CRC-32 is not defined there... :-) > > It is kind of funny, since I have seen other RFCs (for example 2823) > that use CRC-32 and they also have that reference, V.41... > > Just go and check ITU-T V.41 and try to find any reference to > CRC-32... nothing... just CRC-16... Moreover, the definition of the CRC-16 > algorithm is not there, just the polynomial used... > > So I guess that the right document in the References section would > be: > > [CRC-32] ITU-T Recommendation V.42, "Error-correcting procedures for > DCEs using asynchronous-to-synchronous conversion", section 8.1.1.6.2, > October 1996. > > One last minor thing. In the paragraph that makes the reference to > the ITU-T standard, you can read: > > "... in [CRC-32] and uses the polynominal polynomial is (X^32..." > > Wouldn't it be better... > > "... in [CRC-32] and the used polynomial is (X^32..." ? > > That's all folks! Thanks! > > BR Iván Arias Rodríguez > > _______________________________________________ > tsvwg mailing list > tsvwg@ietf.org > http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg -- Randall R. Stewart randall@stewart.chicago.il.us 815-342-5222 (cell phone) _______________________________________________ tsvwg mailing list tsvwg@ietf.org http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg
- [Tsvwg] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Matt Crawford
- [Tsvwg] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Randall Stewart at work
- [Tsvwg] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Matt Crawford
- RE: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Douglas Otis
- Re: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Randall Stewart
- RE: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Douglas Otis
- Re: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Randall Stewart
- Re: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Ian Rytina
- Re: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Scott Bradner
- Re: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Ian Rytina
- RE: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Black_David
- RE: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Douglas Otis
- RE: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Black_David
- RE: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Douglas Otis
- RE: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Ivan.Arias-Rodriguez
- Re: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Randall Stewart
- RE: [Tsvwg] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpcsum-… Douglas Otis