IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Teredo Extensions vs. draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-18

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Sat, 09 April 2022 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD2E3A0DEF for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 08:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gj05RgwnyHzw for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 08:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63E913A0DFC for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 08:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C55F112B51 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 11:58:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:cc:content-type; s=sasl; bh=tsxwjQMkK6TzO2bChgQgnLhPQGmgwil2 Lk1VjyEBw/Q=; b=r2vNdHE36iUeeJ8d7Ji7sxzzID7ISEd3CTJVZNXJcEG3o5Qy zQAhquLAzHafz579/FpXZrLSUB8ZS3Wu7w988llGll3CEle+tZcm4UlwZdbPk9FC Uw0uhSZW4mHUy4iIbbZ2mSbM6J1QCRW1kYz5K8/BBgux3KbOmQ7oQ5LxtVM=
Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC21112B50 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 11:58:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: from mail-vk1-f175.google.com (unknown [209.85.221.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2660D112B4F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 11:58:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: by mail-vk1-f175.google.com with SMTP id h27so4034163vkn.7 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 08:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Tx2qnqOBvs8imx5Qv3Xiyi9VPoGAbleBavJj9xAkjk3cqHBfW VyfSub2gerjKyWBljYewrtK+9LfbX5ExU1E62hs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyf0CL5NYmzuHvsdGaoNmBIKyqXzGPuHlgsYHFp/3po2SgqTPSW6mUNmGqgx1Zr7CNhbQ2cBUxFtbjoCtNF1xU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:a26:b0:344:70a9:7138 with SMTP id 38-20020a0561220a2600b0034470a97138mr8955475vkn.21.1649519880262; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 08:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220408141318.GA32732@unix-ag.uni-kl.de> <CACL_3VGWdXziMzPzS900+-em=sc+0u1fxkH_skeBBUctJPx2XA@mail.gmail.com> <4FC16FAE-A98D-49E3-A5A1-E3959412CEA7@strayalpha.com> <CACL_3VEfP4HwbnGc4i_g+wmaQXJ34H2dC10tHMs-yQfsKi-RUg@mail.gmail.com> <0E681C1B-0CB2-4C66-BBA3-A7BE4B15B65A@strayalpha.com> <9f053530-9bdf-1530-3af6-68173af3d6d5@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
In-Reply-To: <9f053530-9bdf-1530-3af6-68173af3d6d5@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2022 08:57:47 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VEK6Eh1OcP5Xh_QLhVDedA3JN74gVuw29m66504k2XFrw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VEK6Eh1OcP5Xh_QLhVDedA3JN74gVuw29m66504k2XFrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Auerswald <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
Cc: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D52DBD1C-B81D-11EC-B4DF-CB998F0A682E-06080547!pb-smtp2.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/73uGd5USsU-eI_qGVlShCWS2Cjw>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Teredo Extensions vs. draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-18
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2022 15:58:10 -0000

On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 3:40 AM Erik Auerswald wrote:
> [ ... ] I do not think that this warrants an errata report
> against RFC 4380.

+1

Mike Heard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email