Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-aqm-dualq-coupled-23.txt
Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> Wed, 04 May 2022 17:13 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40198C157B45 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2022 10:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bobbriscoe.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j43g7835WdzR for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2022 10:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu (mail-ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu [185.185.85.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 350EEC14F735 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 May 2022 10:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bobbriscoe.net; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:From:References:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=uPfNqPIeM+Tmjx7nj3Egp6yDd8L2AahgcFjH4HkPLaA=; b=Sjx6v67S/CpHw6xa+afOSzzQmr TTlqjcsIuu7wfvzmtzyAoYJNAqzppehHJMe8LkPgdwtENMx0LoN+/P97q8SmMiKkATExacUx3Daky s8bANmltGYCOxjD2k19O/S1Cyu0yeI7yvGZxXSkbWdAQ73wFKka81DhmiT+llAwBiRA8N+r4d1FLF Va+IN9B4AZCsJeL5qA3neP7Xb8mtSiOOwUOsruJwco6GfPOl8H+goCI+QDx1Cf+qZXNod5yKkeBwD aBQU9mZCoUJN2ENl4ED9L9IfoI2XcxER6+xX+9If+mKbkJ+gLhAhmi6SXOcv6bkUkjm4tiwsHDrWA D2uaMIeA==;
Received: from 67.153.238.178.in-addr.arpa ([178.238.153.67]:41918 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>) id 1nmIYt-0002ya-K3; Wed, 04 May 2022 18:13:10 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------kkveFE5i99pUx8zkpv9eBCKE"
Message-ID: <f31dfd09-89e7-5e01-459b-8deb277e57f4@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 18:13:08 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Content-Language: en-GB
To: tsvwg@ietf.org, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
References: <165168333863.21683.14396270671944138617@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
In-Reply-To: <165168333863.21683.14396270671944138617@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu: authenticated_id: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: ssdrsserver2.hostinginterface.eu: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/8B-rL7xYfbQ6xDMgYCGH8HK5CTo>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-aqm-dualq-coupled-23.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 17:13:16 -0000
Folks, The minor update to the DualQ draft below corrects the point Ingemar made in this thread: Minor comment on draft-ietf-tsvwg-aqm-dualq-coupled-22 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/hqtY8sGnz17nWSuB7rwpVv3pQ30/> We've also added a ref to a research paper that independently validated the experiments referred to already in the draft. Search for [Boru20] in the text. Cheers Bob On 04/05/2022 17:55, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Transport Area Working Group WG of the IETF. > > Title : DualQ Coupled AQMs for Low Latency, Low Loss and Scalable Throughput (L4S) > Authors : Koen De Schepper > Bob Briscoe > Greg White > Filename : draft-ietf-tsvwg-aqm-dualq-coupled-23.txt > Pages : 64 > Date : 2022-05-04 > > Abstract: > This specification defines a framework for coupling the Active Queue > Management (AQM) algorithms in two queues intended for flows with > different responses to congestion. This provides a way for the > Internet to transition from the scaling problems of standard TCP > Reno-friendly ('Classic') congestion controls to the family of > 'Scalable' congestion controls. These are designed for consistently > very Low queuing Latency, very Low congestion Loss and Scaling of > per-flow throughput (L4S) by using Explicit Congestion Notification > (ECN) in a modified way. Until the Coupled DualQ, these L4S senders > could only be deployed where a clean-slate environment could be > arranged, such as in private data centres. The coupling acts like a > semi-permeable membrane: isolating the sub-millisecond average > queuing delay and zero congestion loss of L4S from Classic latency > and loss; but pooling the capacity between any combination of > Scalable and Classic flows with roughly equivalent throughput per > flow. The DualQ achieves this indirectly, without having to inspect > transport layer flow identifiers and without compromising the > performance of the Classic traffic, relative to a single queue. The > DualQ design has low complexity and requires no configuration for the > public Internet. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-aqm-dualq-coupled/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tsvwg-aqm-dualq-coupled-23.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-aqm-dualq-coupled-23 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > -- ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoehttp://bobbriscoe.net/
- [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-aqm-dualq-co… internet-drafts
- Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-aqm-dual… Bob Briscoe