IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Adoption call: draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-02 to end 10th January 2018

Derek Fawcus <dfawcus+lists-tsvwg@employees.org> Wed, 10 January 2018 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <dfawcus@employees.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2C01270AE for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 06:16:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id du5KSUxDIxEB for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 06:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from accordion.employees.org (accordion.employees.org [198.137.202.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC8DB12420B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 06:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by accordion.employees.org (Postfix, from userid 1736) id 85E962D5085; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:16:44 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:16:44 +0000
From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus+lists-tsvwg@employees.org>
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Cc: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180110141644.GA70621@accordion.employees.org>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362FE164EB@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <9837331A-76DF-4137-9612-CC653E869553@netapp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9837331A-76DF-4137-9612-CC653E869553@netapp.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/8EBc_-BCmluNv1YHRmoxDgLGzWY>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Adoption call: draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-02 to end 10th January 2018
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:16:47 -0000

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:11:35AM +0000, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> would someone clarify what the intended relationship of the mechanism described in the document and QUIC is? For example, is the intention here that QUIC should implement this,  is this unrelated, or anything in between?
> 
> Asking, because if there is an intended relationship, it would be good to discuss this sooner rather than later.

Similarly in section 1 (para 1 & 9) mention is made of its applicability to DCCP,
but then nothing is mentioned about it subsequently.

Should this document also cover the details for DCCP at the same level as for UDP?

DF

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email