IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] These L4S issues reported are not show stoppers

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Mon, 18 November 2019 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A0012094E for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:11:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T1SsDJOIQTdp for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:11:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAB9D120842 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:11:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id ay6so9963133plb.0 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:11:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QhX6NPLGcmd8BWOGYCOvKZaD3zgHMhgiuTBXq7xXtl0=; b=SUHDyLTlCA/TilgFwNAz29O8gSIpdVo4vSC87q6MQ/V5ZHVmLNDerkTWzBjL38vyFw PlgHJDx/OcXzocUgYYLYz4RZjeix8GzBoQPb3l1WtjTzLSO86aE7BiFlBVv29jyzKYjA BLJy1gI/hTdP579OoOg6i5VRistJvgVzLX/JQTNOq8j3FHgDboiy1Ap9H9GAdhN/Xk1R dKsLcAKZAwfwKkGHx/4lW/o7ERU4Eiy96GuG+sEO6B46XjWPQX7NcaWA8f0+2EZZ+IC4 jtxinYB33zXUNNiSmybUCSXt/U5rtXHYSCJQu836ajMOkqfqRJQMo+OwRyg5Yt2yqTvB HKoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QhX6NPLGcmd8BWOGYCOvKZaD3zgHMhgiuTBXq7xXtl0=; b=udPv88hcENIU8kAP5HIvdGg6J7lxaSgliDIz7gF6beTIuUVFQ0jpNCDd6C7gGCVqrd 45F3P3ECSLZJTVNQjoBGoF8wOGVJjGmvH9w2S48NRD+6rnIH5eAPnMGUgEbQInKoUMtK X4QTL2OpBOd7Iib/Dhxk0t1YCF1rmPf3yO+/DDYT9vnqq+Jfpbrei3ood4yOn07VFR93 WrU0utb9NZ2bsS3Zzo9tjG9U5V67lOLT0U/0st7pl1BFfvBdfcn+KmEobtYrNc2pkp+Y iLi30OFRUVfPWvYlAykAdIyA+s8sXpZ45Yt0P/3Ql9TZyX7D2nd7FIGUAjlVofWa/G62 VW7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXubEgFQO7VFC8SmvcA25h5QnBJOFebHlqr3fhGvNjkLnBmEyB9 AI5zpgYMqxbN6h7doWdgq5qJaLZjVt8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz9CKt3jtIgc+lFxzg5hJba4+acnd1YcCMcDObFWx1G+jpBL3ZW9SMobapeWXWKtxWU9Aybsg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8a0e:: with SMTP id w14mr40192928pjn.7.1574089878300; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:11:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan ([182.55.197.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6sm22297213pfy.43.2019.11.18.07.11.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:11:17 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1FD4EBCE-C566-49E3-97CC-925B6F2C5F36@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 23:11:14 +0800
Cc: "De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com>, "gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AA45FE50-8B0B-418A-858D-96F9924A59E8@gmail.com>
References: <AM4PR07MB3459A1508B3D289BC8AE345DB94D0@AM4PR07MB3459.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <1FD4EBCE-C566-49E3-97CC-925B6F2C5F36@gmx.de>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/9JW7b6JOxavkByGDfo6fjX2LLK0>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] These L4S issues reported are not show stoppers
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:11:20 -0000

> On 18 Nov, 2019, at 10:13 pm, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Requirements that currently TCP Prague does not seem to meet, no?

I do think this is the crux of the problem, yes.  If there is an L4S congestion control implementation that *does* meet the Prague Requirements, I have not seen it; only TCP Prague has been promoted in public by the L4S team.

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email