[Tsvwg] RE: The mail we discussed
"Francois Le Faucheur \(flefauch\)" <flefauch@cisco.com> Thu, 13 October 2005 17:42 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQ762-000682-RO; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:42:26 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQ761-00067u-TI for tsvwg@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:42:26 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA01230 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:42:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.140]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EQ7Ga-00023N-G9 for tsvwg@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:53:20 -0400
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2005 19:42:16 +0200
Received: from xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-331.cisco.com [144.254.231.71]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j9DHgCHH017826; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:42:13 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from xmb-ams-333.cisco.com ([144.254.231.78]) by xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:42:12 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:42:07 +0200
Message-ID: <A05118C6DF9320488C77F3D5459B17B7013B20DA@xmb-ams-333.emea.cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: The mail we discussed
Thread-Index: AcXQAxWGqHp3eaHERdKW7S4NnIBk2QAGHidQ
From: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com>
To: falk@isi.edu
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2005 17:42:12.0859 (UTC) FILETIME=[719BC4B0:01C5D01D]
X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5ebbf074524e58e662bc8209a6235027
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: [Tsvwg] RE: The mail we discussed
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
Hello Aaron, As per TSVWG final minutes (available from http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05aug/index.html) " Allison declares enough support to go ahead. The requirement will be a least a couple of RSVP reviewers (from the RSVP team) to write during WGLC. " So I believe the agreement was that the "RSVP team" members review would happen during the WGLC. Thanks Francois PS: For one of my other documents (draft-lefaucheur-rsvp-ipsec-01.txt) there was indeed a sort of "prerequisite" that some security experts review the doc before the WG can moce too far with that document. Perhaps this is where the confusion comes from. ________________________________ From: Aaron Falk <falk@ISI.EDU> Date: October 13, 2005 12:06:45 AM EDT To: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com>, Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>, "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> Cc: gash@att.com, Davenport Michael <davenport_michael@bah.com>, tsvwg@ietf.org, Christou Chris <christou_chris@bah.com> Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] WG Last Call on draft-tsvwg-rsvp-dste-00.txt Francois- My (admittedly vague) recollection is that the expert writeup was a pre-requisite to WGLC, not part of WGLC. --aaron --On October 12, 2005 5:04:18 PM +0200 "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com> wrote: Hello Allison, Jon, I understand the decision at last meeting was to issue a WG Last Call on <draft-tsvwg-rsvp-dste-00.tx> and make sure that, as part of the WGLC, at least a couple of "RSVP Team" members write up their reviews. Could we go ahead with the LC? Could you help identify who from the "RSVP Team" can commit to written reviews? That way we could work face to face in Vancouver to close potential comments/issues from the review. Thank you Francois =================================== From draft minutes: " Allison said that she is willing to have a WGLC, but the WG needs to have written reviews from the people that call themselves the "RSVP team". Any objections? No one voiced objections. Allson called for a hum: People supporting wglc at this time? There was moderate support Allison declares enough support to go ahead. The requirement will be a least a couple of RSVP reviewers (from the RSVP team) to write during WGLC. " _______________________________________________ tsvwg mailing list tsvwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg _______________________________________________ tsvwg mailing list tsvwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg _______________________________________________ tsvwg mailing list tsvwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg
- [Tsvwg] RE: The mail we discussed Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)