Re: [tsvwg] WG adoption call: draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11 - through June 25

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Thu, 23 June 2016 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAF612B065 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oYbrtNL7oJ5T for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D397B12B037 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2455; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1466699918; x=1467909518; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=iHwHLl1xcJA3QEqi9bbb8xCwzgWdTgOQkjaxPRnwLtg=; b=gRpc4lvXtnUw0mHM62HUH0Ate5R+p0OwgsvET90YOt3sR4l6UDJhkqwU eJAmRKzeCkqzB64tAz8Xla08hiOoMkDT4N9YJjxlD7vhq8yHplZG7Yz3T pWqfxmf0yRnQKaBDe9JsLDak3Mtosjnn37Kj+h84wpUnIfU6Iv1iiBth0 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BrAgBAEGxX/4kNJK1dgz6BUwa1M4UBgXqGGAKBLDgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhE0BAQQdXBACAQgEAUEyFBECBA4FiDDHDAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARyIHgiCToE5glkRAYNIgi8FmH8BiDuFdYFphFODLoU6j30BHjaCFYFbbohvNn8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,517,1459814400"; d="scan'208,217";a="287357297"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Jun 2016 16:38:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (xch-rtp-004.cisco.com [64.101.220.144]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5NGcbOp025270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:38:38 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-004.cisco.com (64.101.220.144) by XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (64.101.220.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:38:37 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-004.cisco.com ([64.101.220.144]) by XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com ([64.101.220.144]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:38:37 -0400
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] WG adoption call: draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11 - through June 25
Thread-Index: AQHRzW2w40Tn72uFVEWIrEdk7dqyHQ==
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:38:37 +0000
Message-ID: <FA73E768-12D6-4FD4-9671-84F9FC2766AD@cisco.com>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F57A2A4@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F57A2A4@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.165]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FA73E76812D64FD4967184F9FC2766ADciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/9jyVTTa3fNNtNrlrvLfVfDT6KQY>
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] WG adoption call: draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11 - through June 25
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:38:40 -0000

The authors and I discussed some changes to address all of my comments on this draft.

I strongly support adoptions of this draft - the industry needs some common default behavior on theses mappings and we need them sooner rather than later.


On Jun 8, 2016, at 11:14 PM, Black, David <david.black@emc.com> wrote:

This is a TSVWG call for interest in WG adoption of draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11.
If you have read the draft and support WG adoption of it as a work item
and WG draft, please send an email to the list (tsvwg@ietf.org) saying so.

NB: It is important to say that you've read the draft.  If you're willing
to review/comment on future versions of this draft and/or implement this
draft, please say so on the list or in email directly to the chairs
(tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org).