[tsvwg] Draft Honolulu minutes posted
"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Sat, 15 November 2014 03:48 UTC
Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2264F1A1AAE; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:48:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eBHML8xjhB1w; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:48:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailuogwhop.emc.com (mailuogwhop.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA30D1A1AA6; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:48:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from maildlpprd04.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd04.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.36]) by mailuogwprd01.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id sAF3mF0J003382 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:48:16 -0500
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd01.lss.emc.com sAF3mF0J003382
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1416023296; bh=wv8dzxreARABjg5Q3GLm9pf15so=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=nEcM8ebHG5TIa8y17cEs9RwtXAw3W9iv83WuVh9VY023xYQPvSeyWRAIKsVDvpTXL Sdf+pu/h3wPN+Y2ROMSYgoIq6EddsivOVRZ4upta5C2hTKOaEy1d5MCJLorykGyLho viB0VolC/1lM/TU8a7BvtpgnBJv0wfKMTse4xXoY=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd01.lss.emc.com sAF3mF0J003382
Received: from mailusrhubprd51.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd51.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.24]) by maildlpprd04.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:47:46 -0500
Received: from mxhub13.corp.emc.com (mxhub13.corp.emc.com [128.222.70.234]) by mailusrhubprd51.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id sAF3m5nI013731 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:48:06 -0500
Received: from MXHUB105.corp.emc.com (10.253.50.22) by mxhub13.corp.emc.com (128.222.70.234) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.327.1; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:48:05 -0500
Received: from MX104CL02.corp.emc.com ([169.254.8.125]) by MXHUB105.corp.emc.com ([10.253.50.22]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:48:05 -0500
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Draft Honolulu minutes posted
Thread-Index: AdAAhvKsgvidKflzSn6eZ5hy7E5pUQ==
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 03:48:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493626C5E8@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.13.53.238]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd51.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/9vrA3iWPa3ubbhfuGEdK5_DGTVg
Cc: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: [tsvwg] Draft Honolulu minutes posted
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 03:48:20 -0000
... before I get on the plane out of here! http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/minutes/minutes-91-tsvwg Many thanks to Aaron Falk and Joel Halpern for taking notes, as there were lively discussions in both sessions that were not easy to follow. They captured everything important. Here are some important items that people should know about: 1) There are a number of expired WG drafts that need author attention: ECN Encapsulation Guidelines NAT Behavioral Requirements Updates RSVP Multiple Instance Object SCTP NAT Support 2) The sense of the room in Honolulu was to adopt the following two drafts as WG drafts: DiffServ interconnection classes and practice draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon/ UDP Usage Guidelines draft-eggert-tsvwg-rfc5405bis http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eggert-tsvwg-rfc5405bis/ Absent objection on the list, these drafts will be adopted. Please comment by November 30. 3) The meeting determined that there is no WG rough consensus for requiring use of the full UDP checksum for GRE-in-UDP with IPv6. The design team will continue work on when zero checksum is acceptable (as well as congestion considerations). 4) See the minutes for the lengthy and interesting discussion of the tunnel congestion feedback draft. There is one important issue that needs to be followed up across the TSVWG and AQM WGs (aqm list cc:'d for this reason): OPEN ISSUE *1: Should ECN indications (CE) be treated as equivalent to drops? This also came up in AQM. This is primarily about endpoint (or tunnel egress) reaction to CE. Enjoy, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 david.black@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ----------------------------------------------------
- [tsvwg] Draft Honolulu minutes posted Black, David