IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsvwg] comments wanted: draft-eggert-tsvwg-udp-guidelines

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Wed, 07 March 2007 12:31 UTC

Return-path: <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOvJE-00070a-L1; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:31:56 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOvJD-00070N-Te for tsvwg@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:31:55 -0500
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.173] helo=mgw-ext14.nokia.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOvJC-0003f0-FE for tsvwg@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:31:55 -0500
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-ext14.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l27CVPVN012263; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:31:50 +0200
Received: from esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.33]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:31:22 +0200
Received: from mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com ([172.21.143.96]) by esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:31:21 +0200
Received: from [172.21.34.183] (esdhcp034183.research.nokia.com [172.21.34.183]) by mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l27CVKQu011354; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:31:20 +0200
In-Reply-To: <311b45ff3aec752861e167899b6a0842@mac.com>
References: <E1HM9Gt-0001fP-8L@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <21B62EB2-7A61-44EA-A346-3C86BCAADD76@nokia.com> <311b45ff3aec752861e167899b6a0842@mac.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha1"; boundary="Apple-Mail-47--457535004"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Message-Id: <845E19EA-69FD-44BF-858C-DECBB6BB387B@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] comments wanted: draft-eggert-tsvwg-udp-guidelines
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:31:16 +0200
To: ext Sally Floyd <sallyfloyd@mac.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Mar 2007 12:31:21.0732 (UTC) FILETIME=[83582440:01C760B4]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c3a18ef96977fc9bcc21a621cbf1174b
Cc: tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

thanks for the feedback!

On 2007-3-2, at 3:31, ext Sally Floyd wrote:
> My only feedback is that in Section 3.1, when the document says  
> that applications
> should consider implementing TFRC "or otherwise ensure that the  
> application
> complies with the congestion control principles", it might be worth  
> mentioning
> TCP-like congestion control as well.  E.g., "TFRC, TCP-like  
> congestion control,
> or otherwise ensure...".

I assume you mean DCCP CCID2 by "TCP-like congestion control?"

If so, the first paragraph in Section 3 alreadys recommends that apps  
use a congestion-controlled protocol instead of UDP, and points to DCCP.

Or am I misunderstanding?

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email