[tsvwg] Planned update of draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb

Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu> Fri, 17 November 2017 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <roland.bless@kit.edu>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C5B126CB6 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 19:04:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id By_CgwtvrWwS for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 19:04:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.10.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC3411275C5 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 19:04:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from i72vorta.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.71.26] helo=i72vorta.tm.kit.edu) by iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp port 25 iface 141.3.10.81 id 1eFWxC-0003QW-MA for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 04:04:30 +0100
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by i72vorta.tm.kit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38D7DB0069F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 04:04:30 +0100 (CET)
To: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu>
Organization: Institute of Telematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Message-ID: <f6846a8c-71fe-c7c6-86b8-e27d7b6a7c12@kit.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 04:04:28 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ATIS-AV: ClamAV (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-Timestamp: iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de 1510887870.789209741
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/DOdS1zL7LFKBv1kU3XxWL4snGjU>
Subject: [tsvwg] Planned update of draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:04:41 -0000

Hi,

as just stated in the session, I plan to update draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb
to version 3 with at least the following changes:

- Update the DSCP recommendation to pick a DSCP from Pool 3 (XXXX01),
  either 1 or 5 (technical feedback on that appreciated).

- Update to RFCXXXX (right now draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11):
  put in a section (similar to section 6) that describes
  changes to that RFC. To be clear here:
  draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11 should not be updated, it should
  proceed to RFC as is. draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb, however, would
  add changes to that RFC, e.g.,
   +---------------+------+---------+-------------+--------------------+
   | Low-Priority  | LE   | RFC(LE) |     1       | AC_BK (Background) |
   |     Data      |      |         |             |                    |
   +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
  It is, however, not clear to me whether to replace the existing
  mapping or to add it.
- remove the LE-min, LE-strict discussion as it seems to be ok
  recommending a LE transport (e.g., LEDBAT++) on top if one wants
  LE-strict semantics.

Regards,
 Roland