[tsvwg] FW: I-D Action: draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-04.txt

"Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com> Fri, 18 November 2016 04:22 UTC

Return-Path: <David.Black@dell.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6701B1294D8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:22:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.from=David.Black@dell.com header.d=dell.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dell.com header.b=Upj+YRV6; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=emc.com header.b=SysGbCuj
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jCQHOBXInn45 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:22:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from esa4.dell-outbound.iphmx.com (esa4.dell-outbound.iphmx.com [68.232.149.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 849B312985C for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:22:06 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: s=smtpout; d=dell.com; c=simple; q=dns; h=Received:From:Received:Received:X-DKIM:DKIM-Signature: X-DKIM:Received:Received:Received:To:Subject:Thread-Topic: Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: X-Sentrion-Hostname:X-RSA-Classifications; b=syf3f+vfbAmYGtRke7BK+Bz7aivSYaSGsJ6ESAdaHRpmXKOMniKqpPfH JamBVOeS9jhnLfFmDTTNwP/pMCvworgPQ6qC2wajMRdsdiO+BG2mBTawr lEq4Vpa/QLEhdqpUqFe+LjuDl6C/Dpilh1o3GsmR/hNnBURYenwhIXtOT 4=;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dell.com; i=@dell.com; q=dns/txt; s=smtpout; t=1479442926; x=1510978926; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=HTuH3+uwE9qKrxew9bH3l4EqbnacUbdvAqFBINeT+Uc=; b=Upj+YRV6StyVUu2urYPDk4YuNAcFsCsNVp9RMqWYN5KJ1xM6Mo36joY3 0ymjDC8yX8YAhuya8cS3AwHFn5jYeISRoXKwszQqeLNEK7uvn7PX4CKEd tuRL1dmSB4qb2fo30k1K/HLDUvpjO6XkgimLXgFb1Cw+O5PR6WDinhjFD 4=;
Received: from esa4.dell-outbound2.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.98]) by esa4.dell-outbound.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Nov 2016 22:22:05 -0600
From: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>
Received: from mailuogwdur.emc.com ([128.221.224.79]) by esa4.dell-outbound2.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Nov 2016 10:22:05 +0600
Received: from maildlpprd56.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd56.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.160]) by mailuogwprd52.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id uAI4M4mQ002082 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:22:04 -0500
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd52.lss.emc.com uAI4M4mQ002082
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1479442924; bh=qiR5b1tX5+j2x/6ARaGepYVsGj4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=SysGbCujiiTw3oiUGP3wwlURoLYZKep9ITvwYGc7+X3IoneMXoMPdG5Lf3AVcg08r 8PtrPTVd/CxR1QEXN1oNZcn9P41oyeTJUm8WqDGyXpplOE2pSLtu4Nqlne9DXRiHkH /qUy5K6/NGpz+GtYaAi2TbGSrntIRvQKfuOYPCtc=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd52.lss.emc.com uAI4M4mQ002082
Received: from mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.19]) by maildlpprd56.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:21:30 -0500
Received: from MXHUB318.corp.emc.com (MXHUB318.corp.emc.com [10.146.3.96]) by mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id uAI4LvaU018007 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:21:57 -0500
Received: from MX307CL04.corp.emc.com ([fe80::849f:5da2:11b:4385]) by MXHUB318.corp.emc.com ([10.146.3.96]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:21:56 -0500
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSQVLnZevavF2VrkWUyQVNECb7e6DeI2Gg
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 04:21:56 +0000
Message-ID: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F74C024@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
References: <147944273434.1738.10510651475632839184.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <147944273434.1738.10510651475632839184.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.105.8.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/D_JE3t5HlKcT3VT_MLYWQ2fzqmY>
Subject: [tsvwg] FW: I-D Action: draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-04.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 04:22:10 -0000

Here's the -04 version as promised.  I did try to address Gorry's concern than any
congestion response that's part of any experiment be IETF-approved - the
Experimental RFC that describes the experiment suffices, as would a reference
to an Informational or Standards-track RFC.

Next step here is a WG adoption call for this draft - Gorry will run that, as I' m the
draft author ...

Thanks, --David
p.s.  I've not been able to work on the Seoul TSVWG minutes - expect to see draft
minutes sometime next week.

-----Original Message-----
From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:19 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-04.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.


        Title           : Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Experimentation
        Author          : David Black
	Filename        : draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-04.txt
	Pages           : 14
	Date            : 2016-11-17

Abstract:
   Multiple protocol experiments have been proposed that involve changes
   to Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) as specified in RFC 3168.
   This memo summarizes the proposed areas of experimentation to provide
   an overview to the Internet community and updates RFC 3168, a
   Proposed Standard RFC, to allow the experiments to proceed without
   requiring a standards process exception for each Experimental RFC to
   update RFC 3168.  Each experiment is still required to be documented
   in an Experimental RFC.  In addition, this memo makes related updates
   to the ECN specifications for RTP in RFC 6679 and to the ECN
   specifications for DCCP in RFC 4341, RFC 4342 and RFC 5622.  This
   memo also records the conclusion of the ECN Nonce experiment in RFC
   3540, obsoletes RFC 3540 and reclassifies it as Historic to enable
   new experimental use of the ECT(1) codepoint.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-04

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation-04


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt