IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG

<l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> Wed, 08 January 2014 12:15 UTC

Return-Path: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7A61AE357; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 04:15:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kC3z-duMSlUp; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 04:15:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F4B1AE34F; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 04:15:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [85.158.136.51:17945] by server-4.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 43/52-26791-2414DC25; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:14:58 +0000
X-Env-Sender: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-49.messagelabs.com!1389183297!23877013!2
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.200.31]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 9908 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2014 12:14:58 -0000
Received: from exht011p.surrey.ac.uk (HELO EXHT011P.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.200.31) by server-8.tower-49.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Jan 2014 12:14:58 -0000
Received: from EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk ([169.254.1.204]) by EXHT011P.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.200.31]) with mapi; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 12:14:57 +0000
From: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
To: ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:13:29 +0000
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG
Thread-Index: Ac8L5fGpGev5JLGlR1aJoU+6Ux09egAhRjy7
Message-ID: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346AB@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <20140107202040.22438.54920.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140107202040.22438.54920.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:15:12 -0000

Am I the only one who finds putting zero checksums in proposed standards to be a worrying
trend?

Lloyd Wood
http://about.me/lloydwood
________________________________________
From: tsvwg [tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of IETF Secretariat [ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org]
Sent: 07 January 2014 20:20
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: [tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG

Added milestone "Submit 'Specification of GRE in UDP encapsulation' to
IESG as a PS RFC", due December 2014.

URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tsvwg/charter/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email