Re: [tsvwg] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-20

[Bob Briscoe <[e-mail]>]

Dan,

Thank you for the time taken for your review.
It's amazing how no-one has noticed that nit before - fresh eyes!
Fixed. Thank you again.


Bob

On 31/10/2023 20:55, Dan Harkins via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Dan Harkins
> Review result: Ready
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
> security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
> these comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> This draft defines some guidelines that tunneling protocols should
> use to allow for ECN signals to propagate consistently. It is very
> well-written and describes the problem well. The Security
> Considerations are fine and discuss why hop-by-hop integrity of
> ECN in not being proposed.
>
> The summary of the review is "Ready", but with a small nit.
> That nit is that figure 1 shows "subnet A" and "subnet B" but the
> accompanying text talks about "subnet 2", should be "subnet B".
>
>
>
>

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe                               http://bobbriscoe.net/