Re: DRAFT agenda for IETF 83 (Paris)
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Wed, 14 March 2012 21:26 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D0121F8880 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q-OWU089YRam for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr17.networksolutionsemail.com (omr17.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A9321F887F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm-omr4 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr17.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2ELQtiD018371 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:26:55 -0400
Authentication-Results: cm-omr4 smtp.user=wes@mti-systems.com; auth=pass (PLAIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from [107.49.70.3] ([107.49.70.3:46648] helo=[192.168.43.65]) by cm-omr4 (envelope-from <wes@mti-systems.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id D9/FC-14799-E1D016F4; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:26:55 -0400
Message-ID: <4F610D19.60505@mti-systems.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:26:49 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: DRAFT agenda for IETF 83 (Paris)
References: <201203142050.q2EKohtM005341@mtv-core-4.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201203142050.q2EKohtM005341@mtv-core-4.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:26:57 -0000
On 3/14/2012 4:50 PM, James M. Polk wrote: > > ... > > Let the agenda bashing commence... > Why is draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap on the list? It belongs fully in DCCP and has not been discussed on that WG's mailing list in recent history, so I don't know why it needs face-to-face time in TSVWG. I can't imagine what needs to be said on it in 5 minutes of face time that can't be done on the mailing list. We haven't yet closed DCCP and given up it's work to TSVWG ... -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems
- DRAFT agenda for IETF 83 (Paris) James M. Polk
- Re: DRAFT agenda for IETF 83 (Paris) Wesley Eddy
- Re: DRAFT agenda for IETF 83 (Paris) James M. Polk
- RE: DRAFT agenda for IETF 83 (Paris) Jose Saldana
- Re: DRAFT agenda for IETF 83 (Paris) Colin Perkins